-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Frerich Raabe wrote:
I'm running Dovecot 2.1.12 on FreeBSD (quite successfully so, thanks for this
nice piece of software!). One thing which is slightly annoying though is that
automatically created mailboxes (I have lda_mailbox
Hi,
I'm running Dovecot 2.1.12 on FreeBSD (quite successfully so, thanks for
this nice piece of software!). One thing which is slightly annoying
though is that automatically created mailboxes (I have
lda_mailbox_autocreate set) don't have the file permissions I'd like
them to have.
I'm usin
> -Original Message-
> From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:t...@iki.fi]
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 11:14 -0400, Simon Brereton wrote:
> > Aug 29 15:59:14 mail dovecot: deliver(si...@lydiard.net):
> stat(/var/spool/mail/virtual/domain.net/simon/tmp) failed: Permission
> denied (euid=999(mailsystem)
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 11:14 -0400, Simon Brereton wrote:
> Aug 29 15:59:14 mail dovecot: deliver(si...@lydiard.net):
> stat(/var/spool/mail/virtual/domain.net/simon/tmp) failed: Permission denied
> (euid=999(mailsystem) egid=115(mailsystem) missing +x perm:
> /var/spool/mail/virtual)
>
> Even i
> -Original Message-
> From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:t...@iki.fi]
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 11:25 PM
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 13:10 -0400, Simon Brereton wrote:
> > mail:~# ls /var/spool/mail/virtual/domain.net/simon/new/
> > -rwxrwx--- 1 postfix mailsystem 2.5K Aug 26 03:33
> > 131432
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-
> boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Domack
> Just adding that won't make dovecot use it though, you would have to
> include the postconf -n output. Normally something like
> virtual_transport=dovecot
Crap. I
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 13:10 -0400, Simon Brereton wrote:
> mail:~# ls /var/spool/mail/virtual/domain.net/simon/new/
> -rwxrwx--- 1 postfix mailsystem 2.5K Aug 26 03:33
> 1314326000.V801I1666018M803015.mail.net,S=2461:2,
> -rwxrwx--- 1 postfix mailsystem 2.5K Aug 26 03:36
> 1314326209.V801I16660
Just adding that won't make dovecot use it though, you would have to
include the postconf -n output. Normally something like
virtual_transport=dovecot
Quoting Simon Brereton :
On 26 August 2011 19:35, Patrick Domack wrote:
My guess is your delivering email with postfix to the inbox,
instead
On 26 August 2011 19:35, Patrick Domack wrote:
>
> My guess is your delivering email with postfix to the inbox, instead of using
> dovecot-lda. And something odd is going on with that postfix to get odd
> permissions like that.
>
> You probably needed to edit the postfix virtual deliever transpo
My guess is your delivering email with postfix to the inbox, instead
of using dovecot-lda. And something odd is going on with that postfix
to get odd permissions like that.
You probably needed to edit the postfix virtual deliever transport, or
maybe you just forget to active the dovecot-lda
Hi
I'm very new to Dovecot (been using Courier for 5 years), but I've been
persuaded of the merits of Dovecot and since the server needs upgrading that
seems like the perfect time/excuse.
On a test server, I set up postfix and installed Dovecot (running 32-bit Debian
Squeeze, installed from ap
On 2011-03-28 4:21 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-03-28 4:02 PM, David Ford wrote:
>> please make sure this is optional. dovecot always tries to set the wrong
>> ownership on our servers.
>
> Of course I meant a doveadm argument...
>
> Something like doveadm --fix-perms
and of course it s
On 2011-03-28 4:02 PM, David Ford wrote:
> please make sure this is optional. dovecot always tries to set the wrong
> ownership on our servers.
Of course I meant a doveadm argument...
Something like doveadm --fix-perms
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 03/28/11 15:49, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-03-28 3:36 PM, Walt Shekrota wrote:
>> I'm thinking the later may be a procmail issue unless it is related
>> to initial incorrect permissions?
> Timo - I'm curious... some programs have the ability to check
> permissions on their respective direc
On 2011-03-28 3:36 PM, Walt Shekrota wrote:
> I'm thinking the later may be a procmail issue unless it is related
> to initial incorrect permissions?
Timo - I'm curious... some programs have the ability to check
permissions on their respective directories they work with/on, and fix
them if necessa
Dovecot 1.2.12 maildir format using :LAYOUT=fs (my Mail dir came from KDE)
I can't remember the permissions of the /Mail/ directory because I haven't
been concerned with it too much until now. I think they were user:user or
user:mail. Now a new mail ends up 600 root:mail. (in alternate directori
16 matches
Mail list logo
