Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and tcpwrappers

2011-08-23 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 15:39 +0200, Kees Lemmens wrote: > I think I sorted it out : I also had to add a service section to > dovecot.conf and I had to change the old "imap-login" settings in > /etc./hosts.allow to be simply "imap" now. .. > Timo : maybe this could be documented a little better ?

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and tcpwrappers

2011-07-27 Thread Kees Lemmens
Hi, I think I sorted it out : I also had to add a service section to dovecot.conf and I had to change the old "imap-login" settings in /etc./hosts.allow to be simply "imap" now. service tcpwrap {

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and tcpwrappers

2011-07-27 Thread Kees Lemmens
Hi Timo,others, Adding login_access_sockets = tcpwrap wasn't enough : I also had to recompile dovecot 2.0.13 with the --with-libwrap option. Then linking failed as it didn't link with libnsl.so but that was easily fixed. However, if I try to connect now with tcpwrap switched on I still have a

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and tcpwrappers

2011-07-27 Thread Kees Lemmens
Hi Timo, Thanks for the prompt answer ! This solves a large security for me ;-) Any idea why the inetd path is not working anymore in 2.x or is that already somewhere else in the list ? On Wednesday, July 27, 2011, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:16 +0200, Kees Lemmens wrote: >

[Dovecot] dovecot and tcpwrappers

2011-07-27 Thread Kees Lemmens
Hi, I used dovecot 1.x for quite a while and it worked fine. However, I used it through inetd and used hosts.allow/deny to restrict access to only certain groups of systems. Since yesterday I have dovecot 2.0.13. But in version 2.0.13 it seems that starting using inetd doesn't work anymore : I

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and tcpwrappers

2011-07-27 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:16 +0200, Kees Lemmens wrote: > Since yesterday I have dovecot 2.0.13. But in version 2.0.13 it seems > that starting using inetd doesn't work anymore : I only get a strange > error message if I try to connect using telnet : Yeah, won't work. > Is dovecot indeed ignoring