IP-based access is totally fine if that part of your network is
physically secure. It sure solves a lot of headaches.
On 2/10/10 10:22 AM +0100 Per-Erik Persson wrote:
Well, what you describe would be the correct and security aware way of
doing it.
However since I am still testing i just did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
By adding the IP of the server handling the maildeliveries to the group
called mail-writers which has permissions on every users Maildir.
Ah, got it, thanks.
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNAT
Well, what you describe would be the correct and security aware way of
doing it.
However since I am still testing i just did it the quick and dirty way.
By adding the IP of the server handling the maildeliveries to the group
called mail-writers which has permissions on every users Maildir.
So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
I now have dovecots deliver (1.1.?)up and running and delivering mails to
maildirs located on the AFS
So if anyone is wondering, I would say that AFS works as a backend for
storing emails without any u
Sorry for the fuzz on the thread earlier.
I now have dovecots deliver (1.1.?)up and running and delivering mails
to maildirs located on the AFS
So if anyone is wondering, I would say that AFS works as a backend for
storing emails without any ugly patches.
On February 4, 2010 4:40:37 AM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote:
If it acts just like a local filesystem, then it doesn't have any
problems with Dovecot. But that guarantee usually makes the performance
worse, so I would have thought it had less strong guarantees. Anyway, I
don't know almost anything a
On 4.2.2010, at 4.13, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On February 4, 2010 1:41:52 AM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 2.2.2010, at 22.06, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
>>
>>> Scrolling thru the archives gives me a hint that there might be troubles
>>> with AFS together with dovecot and maildir especially the LD
On February 4, 2010 1:41:52 AM +0200 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 2.2.2010, at 22.06, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
Scrolling thru the archives gives me a hint that there might be troubles
with AFS together with dovecot and maildir especially the LDA Is this
still an issue or should I prepare for spendin
On 2.2.2010, at 22.06, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
> Scrolling thru the archives gives me a hint that there might be troubles with
> AFS together with dovecot and maildir especially the LDA
> Is this still an issue or should I prepare for spending time to solve it?
> If someone successfully got it to
Frank Cusack skrev 2010-02-02 21:37:
On February 2, 2010 9:06:45 PM +0100 Per-Erik Persson
wrote:
Scrolling thru the archives gives me a hint that there might be troubles
with AFS together with dovecot and maildir especially the LDA
Is this still an issue or should I prepare for spending time t
On February 2, 2010 9:06:45 PM +0100 Per-Erik Persson
wrote:
Scrolling thru the archives gives me a hint that there might be troubles
with AFS together with dovecot and maildir especially the LDA
Is this still an issue or should I prepare for spending time to solve it?
If someone successfully go
Scrolling thru the archives gives me a hint that there might be troubles
with AFS together with dovecot and maildir especially the LDA
Is this still an issue or should I prepare for spending time to solve it?
If someone successfully got it to work in a small or large scale
environment I would be
12 matches
Mail list logo
