On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:49:21 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 25.8.2010, at 20.24, fakessh wrote:
>
>> but my mail for Maildir is deferred
>>
>> Aug 25 21:15:56 r13151 postfix/local[11667]: A70535808A:
>> to=, orig_to=,
>> relay=local, delay=0.55, delays=0.3/0.02/0/0.23, dsn=4.3.0,
>> status=defe
On 25.8.2010, at 20.24, fakessh wrote:
> but my mail for Maildir is deferred
>
> Aug 25 21:15:56 r13151 postfix/local[11667]: A70535808A:
> to=, orig_to=,
> relay=local, delay=0.55, delays=0.3/0.02/0/0.23, dsn=4.3.0,
> status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: doveconf: Warning:
> Obsol
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:40:19 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:31 +0200, fakessh wrote:
>
>> executable = /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-auth
>
> Remove this
>
>> executable = /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
>
> And this.
>
>> executable = /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap
>
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:31 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> executable = /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-auth
Remove this
> executable = /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
And this.
> executable = /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap
And this.
> executable = /usr/libexec/dovecot/managesieve-login
And this.
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:14:31 +0200, Thomas Leuxner
wrote:
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2010-August/000167.html
>
> Sums it up pretty much. I have the feeling checking usual suspects is
> asking too much nowadays. Gone are the glorious days of RTFM.
>
> Mr. fakessh ,
>
sorry for me
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2010-August/000167.html
Sums it up pretty much. I have the feeling checking usual suspects is asking
too much nowadays. Gone are the glorious days of RTFM.
Mr. fakessh ,
Hijacking this thread, in addition to your original one, is at least
counter-produc
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:37:04 +0300, Odhiambo Washington
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> is there some specials recommentations to migrate from dovecot 1.1.x to
>> 2.0.1 with FreeBSD boxes ?
>>
>>
> If dovecot-1.1.x is serving your needs fully, then
Am 25.08.2010 um 19:43 schrieb Odhiambo Washington:
> That is why I added ":-)" …
Well NOT RECOMMENDED is definitely the wrong statement, even at the risk I'm
missing the subtle irony there...
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 25.08.2010 um 19:37 schrieb Odhiambo Washington:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Frank Bonnet
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> is there some specials recommentations to migrate from dovecot 1.1.x to
> >> 2.0.1 with FreeBSD boxe
Am 25.08.2010 um 19:37 schrieb Odhiambo Washington:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> is there some specials recommentations to migrate from dovecot 1.1.x to
>> 2.0.1 with FreeBSD boxes ?
>>
>>
> If dovecot-1.1.x is serving your needs fully, then IT IS N
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> is there some specials recommentations to migrate from dovecot 1.1.x to
> 2.0.1 with FreeBSD boxes ?
>
>
If dovecot-1.1.x is serving your needs fully, then IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED to
upgrade:-)
Or did you mean to ask differently? I r
Hello
is there some specials recommentations to migrate
from dovecot 1.1.x to 2.0.1 with FreeBSD boxes ?
Thanks
12 matches
Mail list logo
