Yeah, not caching then. I know Glusterfs people implemented some
fixes/workarounds to make Dovecot work better. I don't know if all of those
fixes are in the public glusterfs.
On 6.4.2012, at 18.39, James Devine wrote:
> As it turns out I can duplicate this problem with a single dovecot server
As it turns out I can duplicate this problem with a single dovecot server
and a single gluster server using mdbox, so maybe not caching? This being
the case I don't think director would help
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:16 PM, James Devine wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:39 AM, wrote:
>
>>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:39 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:56:12 -0600, James Devine
> wrote:
> > Anyone know how to setup dovecot with mdbox so that it can be used
> through
> > shared storage from multiple hosts? I've setup a gluster volume and am
> > sharing it between 2 test clients.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:03:01 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.3.2012, at 19.43,
> wrote:
>
>>> Have you tried stress testing it with imaptest? Run in parallel for
both
>>> servers:
>> I did stress test it, but we have developed a "mail bot net" tool for
the
>> purpose. I should mention this
On 23.3.2012, at 19.43, wrote:
>> Have you tried stress testing it with imaptest? Run in parallel for both
>> servers:
> I did stress test it, but we have developed a "mail bot net" tool for the
> purpose. I should mention this was tested using dovecot 1.2, as this is
> our current production v
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:06:25 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.3.2012, at 15.39,
> wrote:
>
>> I was able to get dovecot working across a gluster cluster a few weeks
>> ago
>> and it worked just fine. I would recommend using the native gluster
>> mount
>> option (need to install gluster soft
On 23.3.2012, at 19.11, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I assume you do still have some minor locking/performance issues with
> the INBOX, even with Director, when LDA and the user MUA are both
> hitting the INBOX index and mbox files. You'll still see this with
> mdbox, but probably to a lesser degree if
On 3/23/2012 7:13 AM, Jim Lawson wrote:
> On 3/23/12 3:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>>> Speaking as an admin who has run Dovecot on top of GFS both with and
>>> without the director, I would never go back to a cluster without the
>>> director. The cluster performs *so* much better when glocks ca
On 23.3.2012, at 15.39, wrote:
> I was able to get dovecot working across a gluster cluster a few weeks ago
> and it worked just fine. I would recommend using the native gluster mount
> option (need to install gluster software on clients), and using distributed
> replicated as your replication
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:56:12 -0600, James Devine
wrote:
> Anyone know how to setup dovecot with mdbox so that it can be used
through
> shared storage from multiple hosts? I've setup a gluster volume and am
> sharing it between 2 test clients. I'm using postfix/dovecot LDA for
> delivery and I'm
On 3/23/12 3:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Speaking as an admin who has run Dovecot on top of GFS both with and
>> without the director, I would never go back to a cluster without the
>> director. The cluster performs *so* much better when glocks can be
>> cached on a single node, and this can't
On 3/22/2012 11:17 AM, Jim Lawson wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 12:11 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 3/21/2012 12:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> The problem is most likely the same as with NFS: Server A caches data ->
>>> server B modifies data -> server A modifies data using stale cached state
>>> ->
On 03/22/2012 12:11 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 3/21/2012 12:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> The problem is most likely the same as with NFS: Server A caches data ->
>> server B modifies data -> server A modifies data using stale cached state ->
>> corruption. Glusterfs works with FUSE, and FUSE
On 3/21/2012 12:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The problem is most likely the same as with NFS: Server A caches data ->
> server B modifies data -> server A modifies data using stale cached state ->
> corruption. Glusterfs works with FUSE, and FUSE has quite similar problems as
> NFS.
>
> With d
The problem is most likely the same as with NFS: Server A caches data -> server
B modifies data -> server A modifies data using stale cached state ->
corruption. Glusterfs works with FUSE, and FUSE has quite similar problems as
NFS.
With director you guarantee that the same mailbox isn't access
Also I don't seem to get these errors with a single dovecot machine using
the shared storage and it looks like there are multiple simultaneous
delivery processes running
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:25 AM, James Devine wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 21
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.3.2012, at 17.56, James Devine wrote:
>
> > Anyone know how to setup dovecot with mdbox so that it can be used
> through
> > shared storage from multiple hosts? I've setup a gluster volume and am
> > sharing it between 2 test clients
On 21.3.2012, at 17.56, James Devine wrote:
> Anyone know how to setup dovecot with mdbox so that it can be used through
> shared storage from multiple hosts? I've setup a gluster volume and am
> sharing it between 2 test clients. I'm using postfix/dovecot LDA for
> delivery and I'm using postal
Anyone know how to setup dovecot with mdbox so that it can be used through
shared storage from multiple hosts? I've setup a gluster volume and am
sharing it between 2 test clients. I'm using postfix/dovecot LDA for
delivery and I'm using postal to send mail between 40 users. In doing
this, I'm s
19 matches
Mail list logo
