On Jul 18, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Mateusz Kijowski wrote:
Why does it matter where the timestamp lives? No matter how it was
stored, you would have had the exact same problem because your client
told Dovecot to use the current timestamp when saving the messages.
And why would keeping the INTERNALDA
On Jul 18, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Karl Rudnick wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 08:52 -0700, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Why does it matter where the timestamp lives? No matter how it was
stored, you would have had the exact same problem because your client
told Dovecot to use the current timestamp when savin
>
> Why does it matter where the timestamp lives? No matter how it was
> stored, you would have had the exact same problem because your client
> told Dovecot to use the current timestamp when saving the messages.
>
> And why would keeping the INTERNALDATE in mtime be bad? It only
> changes if you w
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 08:52 -0700, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Why does it matter where the timestamp lives? No matter how it was
> stored, you would have had the exact same problem because your client
> told Dovecot to use the current timestamp when saving the messages.
>
> And why would keeping
On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Karl Rudnick wrote:
How could any implementation of this protocol possibly use a file
system
time stamp to represent that important piece of meta-data,
no matter where the file lives? It seems totally reasonable that
this is
what Outlook uses for the Received dat
OTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] changing INTERNALDATE or similar
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dovecot Mailing List
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
quests
through this mail group given the caveat that it is only guaranteed to
work for MY personal data store.
Thanks - Karl
-Original Message-
From: Rudnick, Karl
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:06 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Cc: Timo Sirainen
Subject: RE: [Dovecot] changing INTERNALDATE
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I believe it's still true that any mail files that are IMAP STORE'd
> (uploaded)
You mean IMAP APPENDed.
> to Dovecot by a client will have a current mtime, rather than
> the "Date" in the message. That means might need to compare
t
> available when I get it smoothed out.
>
> Thanks again for the clarification.
> - Karl
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:58 AM
> To: Rudnick, Karl; Dovecot Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot
r the clarification.
- Karl
-Original Message-
From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:58 AM
To: Rudnick, Karl; Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] changing INTERNALDATE or similar
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:56 -0700, Karl Rudnick wrote:
> I
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:56 -0700, Karl Rudnick wrote:
> I have a question which others must have encountered. I switched from
> uw-imap to dovecot-imap a few months ago and moved my fairly large mail
> archive (~15 yrs) by simply mounting both accounts in a mail app and
> simply copying my folders
I have a question which others must have encountered. I switched from
uw-imap to dovecot-imap a few months ago and moved my fairly large mail
archive (~15 yrs) by simply mounting both accounts in a mail app and
simply copying my folders over. This worked well, and all my mail is in
order when I vie
12 matches
Mail list logo
