Mark Zealey a écrit :
>> Mark Zealey a écrit :
>>> Thanks; these look interesting. We have a similar nas setup
>> but we have
>>> 2 frontend dovecot servers connecting to it and store the
>> indexes over
>>> nfs.
>> Could you please tell me how have you done this configuration ?
>> 2 frontend
> Mark Zealey a écrit :
> > Thanks; these look interesting. We have a similar nas setup
> but we have
> > 2 frontend dovecot servers connecting to it and store the
> indexes over
> > nfs.
> Could you please tell me how have you done this configuration ?
> 2 frontend dovecot proxy with 10 dovecot
Mark Zealey a écrit :
> Thanks; these look interesting. We have a similar nas setup but we have
> 2 frontend dovecot servers connecting to it and store the indexes over
> nfs.
Could you please tell me how have you done this configuration ?
2 frontend dovecot proxy with 10 dovecot mda ? We are lo
Thanks; these look interesting. We have a similar nas setup but we have
2 frontend dovecot servers connecting to it and store the indexes over
nfs. We also have around 10 mail servers running deliver to try to keep
the indexes on the nfs store up-to-date. Have you done any tests with
the speed of m
Hello,
We would like to do a feed back to this active mailing list. We are
working on a migration project from cyrus to dovecot. And we have just
completed the benchmark sequence.
As I say, this benchmark is here only to show that our old imap server
is out to date. I would not be the source of c
