Il giorno 20/ott/2010, alle ore 18.20, Jose Luis Faria ha scritto:
> Hello people,
>
> I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging Security
> Suite from Trendmicro.
>
> I need to develop a new solution with:
> - postfix
> - dovecot
> - anti-spam
> - anti-malware.
>
> I am
I use, spamassassin, postfix , mailscanner, dovecot
before i use postgrey, but it was giving to many problens because we scaled
for many host.
I am loking for sqlgrey now to test it.
[]'sf.rique
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:52 PM, "Robert M. Münch" <
robert.mue...@saphirion.com> wrote:
> -B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Am 25.10.2010 um 19:40 schrieb Marc Perkel:
> On 10/20/2010 9:20 AM, Jose Luis Faria wrote:
>> Hello people,
>>
>> I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging Security
>> Suite from Trendmicro.
>>
>> I need to develop a new so
On 10/20/2010 9:20 AM, Jose Luis Faria wrote:
Hello people,
I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging
Security Suite from Trendmicro.
I need to develop a new solution with:
- postfix
- dovecot
- anti-spam
- anti-malware.
I am thankful any help or suggestion for an
Dmitri V. Ivanov put forth on 10/22/2010 11:01 AM:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:58:46AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> It was donated to me, and by default the community, by an anonymous
>> poster to the spam-l mailing list, quite some time ago. We were having
>> a discussion about blocking dynami
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:58:46AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> It was donated to me, and by default the community, by an anonymous
> poster to the spam-l mailing list, quite some time ago. We were having
> a discussion about blocking dynamic/generic rDNS hosts. Many of us were
> using really co
Miha Vrhovnik put forth on 10/21/2010 3:01 PM:
> "Stan Hoeppner" wrote on 21.10.2010 10:29:50:
>
>>
>> This will kill a huge amount of bot spam without dnsbl queries or
>> greylisting, both of which can be resource hogs and add serious latency:
>>
>> http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre
>>
>
"Stan Hoeppner" wrote on 21.10.2010 10:29:50:
>
>This will kill a huge amount of bot spam without dnsbl queries or
>greylisting, both of which can be resource hogs and add serious latency:
>
>http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre
>
Stan,
nice one. I'm wondering from where did you compile this
On 10/21/2010 07:37 AM, Fabricio Archanjo wrote:
> Does someone run dspam or just me??
> I like very much this antispam solution.
>
I use it with Eugene's port/fork of dovecot-antispam to dovecot 2.0. I
use it with amavisd. I use postfix in the mix. On machines where people
don't care about danger
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:18:46AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:52:38 +0800
> Denny Lin articulated:
>
> > Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that. A better solution would be to check
> > the rDNS or SPF record and do sender verification if it doesn't match.
>
> Actually, "SPF" has bee
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:52:38 +0800
Denny Lin articulated:
> Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that. A better solution would be to check
> the rDNS or SPF record and do sender verification if it doesn't match.
Actually, "SPF" has been going out of vogue for awhile now and sensible
mail admins do not m
On 2010-10-21 9:37 AM, Fabricio Archanjo wrote:
> Does someone run dspam or just me??
> I like very much this antispam solution.
I *much* prefer ASSP myself...
Vastly easier to install/configure than dspam, and more effective too
imnsho, *especially out of the box, but even also after dspam is
pr
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:37:40 -0200, Fabricio Archanjo
wrote:
Does someone run dspam or just me??
I like very much this antispam solution.
I use dspam + sqlgrey + policyd-weight to prevent spam.
60% rejects are invalid recipient drop
30% nonreturning from sqlgrey
10% goes to dspam with autole
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:26:46AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-10-20 10:18 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
> > Postfix's address verification is also quite useful for popular domains
> > like gmail.com, hotmail.com, yahoo.com, etc.
>
> If you mean you are using *sender* address verification on the
Does someone run dspam or just me??
I like very much this antispam solution.
On 10/21/10, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-10-20 10:18 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
>> Postfix's address verification is also quite useful for popular domains
>> like gmail.com, hotmail.com, yahoo.com, etc.
>
> If you mean you
On 2010-10-20 10:18 PM, Denny Lin wrote:
> Postfix's address verification is also quite useful for popular domains
> like gmail.com, hotmail.com, yahoo.com, etc.
If you mean you are using *sender* address verification on these
domains, you will eventually get blacklisted by them if your system has
Jose Luis Faria wrote on 10/20/2010:
Hello people,
I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging
Security Suite from Trendmicro.
I need to develop a new solution with:
- postfix
- dovecot
- anti-spam
- anti-malware.
I am thankful any help or suggestion for anti-spam a
Denny Lin wrote on 10/20/2010:
Currently, I am using a setup with Postfix + Dovecot as well.
We're using these DNSBL blacklists:
zen.spamhaus.org
b.barracudacentral.org
cbl.abuseat.org
bl.spamcop.net
dnsbl.njabl.org
info:
it's not needed to use cbl.abuseat.org AND zen.spamhaus.org because
Jose Luis Faria put forth on 10/20/2010 11:20 AM:
> Hello people,
>
> I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging Security
> Suite from Trendmicro.
>
> I need to develop a new solution with:
> - postfix
> - dovecot
> - anti-spam
> - anti-malware.
>
> I am thankful any hel
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:20:20PM +0100, Jose Luis Faria wrote:
> I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging Security
> Suite from Trendmicro.
>
> I need to develop a new solution with:
> - postfix
> - dovecot
> - anti-spam
> - anti-malware.
Currently, I am using a setu
check postgrey , it works great with postfix .
http://www.debuntu.org/postfix-and-postgrey-a-proactive-approach-to-spam-filtering
postgrey should I think be used in addition to the other suggestions.
since we started using postgrey the amount of work done by our other
anti-spam software, spamassa
I'm runnning dovecot + dovecot-antispam + dspam + exim.
Dovecot-antispam trains in background the DSPAM when the users move
the messages to another folder, I have a knowledge base always
updated. It works fine.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 10/20/10 12:20 PM, Jose Lu
On 10/20/10 12:20 PM, Jose Luis Faria wrote:
I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging Security
Suite from Trendmicro.
I need to develop a new solution with:
- postfix
- dovecot
- anti-spam
- anti-malware.
I am thankful any help or suggestion for anti-spam and anti-malware
Hello people,
I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging Security
Suite from Trendmicro.
I need to develop a new solution with:
- postfix
- dovecot
- anti-spam
- anti-malware.
I am thankful any help or suggestion for anti-spam and anti-malware.
Thanks in advance!
--
24 matches
Mail list logo
