Timo,
thanks for having a look at my message...
This looks scary, wouldn't it work without it? : request->failed = FALSE;
I simply copied the logic from existing code in the same function.
Also, don't these work already?
any = 0.0.0.0/0
none = 0.0.0.0/32
Or I'm not sure if the 0.0.0.0/0 m
On 20.5.2014, at 12.41, Andreas Schulze wrote:
> Andreas Schulze:
> in January: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-January/094606.html
>
> Hello,
>
> looks like there is only little interest on allow_nets + ldap :-/
>
> I step forward to put this feature in our production environment.
> So I
Andreas Schulze:
in January: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-January/094606.html
Hello,
looks like there is only little interest on allow_nets + ldap :-/
I step forward to put this feature in our production environment.
So I like to ask again if the patch may be included in dovecot
and revi
Hello,
I'm playing with allow_nets function. It is really cool!
In a filebased passwd backend you simply add "allow_nets=192.0.2.143/32"
as mentioned in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/AllowNets
But if I use an LDAP backend it looks different.
Following http://wiki2.dovecot.
