Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 18:38 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> BTW could you add to your "todo list" an option for making deliver use
>> sieve script specified via command line including turning off sieve
>> scripts via command line?
>
> In v2.0 you can override settings. F
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 18:38 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> BTW could you add to your "todo list" an option for making deliver use
> sieve script specified via command line including turning off sieve
> scripts via command line?
In v2.0 you can override settings. For example:
dovecot-lda -o pl
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:03 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 09:08 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> > By specifying content of the header(s) via command line parameter(s)
>> >
>> > e.g.
>> > deliver -d userx -x us...@gmail.com
>> > X-Delivered-To: u
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:03 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 09:08 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> > By specifying content of the header(s) via command line parameter(s)
> >
> > e.g.
> > deliver -d userx -x us...@gmail.com
> > X-Delivered-To: us...@gmail.com
>
> I guess th
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 09:08 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> By specifying content of the header(s) via command line parameter(s)
>
> e.g.
> deliver -d userx -x us...@gmail.com
> X-Delivered-To: us...@gmail.com
I guess there could be a new command line parameter that allows you to
specify any
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 22:41 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> Would it be sensible/"cost effective" to make dovecot-deliver generated
>> X-Delivered-To header(s) based on command line parameter(s)?
>> [after striping such existing headers, before consulting sieve]
>
> How
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 22:41 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Would it be sensible/"cost effective" to make dovecot-deliver generated
> X-Delivered-To header(s) based on command line parameter(s)?
> [after striping such existing headers, before consulting sieve]
How exactly would that work? How i
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 23:57 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 22:41 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> >> a) *clearly* mark POP/IMAP account fetched by fetchmail
> >>[with fetchmail using directly dovecot-deliver in --mda option]
> >
> > Wo
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 22:41 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> a) *clearly* mark POP/IMAP account fetched by fetchmail
>>[with fetchmail using directly dovecot-deliver in --mda option]
>
> Would the fetchmail tracepolls option not do? It generates a header
> like
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 22:41 +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> a) *clearly* mark POP/IMAP account fetched by fetchmail
>[with fetchmail using directly dovecot-deliver in --mda option]
Would the fetchmail tracepolls option not do? It generates a header like
this, including local and remote acco
Would it be sensible/"cost effective" to make dovecot-deliver generated
X-Delivered-To header(s) based on command line parameter(s)?
[after striping such existing headers, before consulting sieve]
I need it to:
a) *clearly* mark POP/IMAP account fetched by fetchmail
[with fetchmail using direct
11 matches
Mail list logo
