On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 00:16 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
> Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 4/7/2008, Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> >> Using dnotify dovecot's performance was very bad. The system consumes
> >> 90% of cpu with just a few imap process running (about 30 pro
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 4/7/2008, Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>> Using dnotify dovecot's performance was very bad. The system consumes
>> 90% of cpu with just a few imap process running (about 30 process).
>> The performance using --with-notify=none was the same as
On 4/7/2008, Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Using dnotify dovecot's performance was very bad. The system consumes
90% of cpu with just a few imap process running (about 30 process).
The performance using --with-notify=none was the same as using
inotify,
so it could be
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:22 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
> donotify is more resource expensive - inotify allows monitoring of
> both
> files and directories via a single open fd.
> so before you try --with-notify=none, try --with-notify=dnotify
Using dnotify dovecot's performance was very bad. T
Uldis Pakuls wrote:
Inotify kernel api is included in "vanilla" kernel since
2.6.17-rc1-mm1 ; before this there were only patches (one of them SuSE
patch).
Fix: inotify is included since 2.6.13; 2.6.17 introduces large api changes.
Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
The problem still remains after I removed hdlm driver.
I've tested on Suse10 with kernel 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp x86_64 and
2.6.16.27-0.9-smp x86_64, with and without hdlm driver. What kernel
version do you use on your suse servers?
2.6.16.13-0.4 (ppc)
2.6.16.
The problem still remains after I removed hdlm driver.
I've tested on Suse10 with kernel 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp x86_64 and
2.6.16.27-0.9-smp x86_64, with and without hdlm driver. What kernel
version do you use on your suse servers?
What is the impact on performance if I compile using --with-notify=no
Uldis,
I'll do it right now and make more tests.
Thanks,
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 01:56 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
> Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
> > I moved the maildir location from Hitachi's storage to local sas disk
> > and got the same erro using imaptest. Debug doesn't show any usabl
Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
I moved the maildir location from Hitachi's storage to local sas disk
and got the same erro using imaptest. Debug doesn't show any usable
information. :-(
Any ideas?
To trace your problem you need to debug kernel... as it is kernel level
crash.
Try ask
That is true, it was a considence. I got an error after that. Now I'm
lost. :-|
What more tests can I do to know where the problem is? I want do more
tests before recompile dovecot with --with-notify.
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 23:41 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:55 -0300, Ra
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:55 -0300, Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
> The erro stops when I uncomment
>
> mail_max_userip_connections = 10
>
> does it make any sence?
The default is 10, so commenting or uncommenting it should make no
difference at all.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
The erro stops when I uncomment
mail_max_userip_connections = 10
does it make any sence?
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:34 -0300, Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
> I moved the maildir location from Hitachi's storage to local sas disk
> and got the same erro using imaptest. Debug doesn't show any
I moved the maildir location from Hitachi's storage to local sas disk
and got the same erro using imaptest. Debug doesn't show any usable
information. :-(
Any ideas?
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:01 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
> Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 09:25 +0
Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 09:25 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
>
>
>> Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> I'm getting strange messages on my new server with dovecot-1.1rc4 + lda
>>> + sieve + ldap + postfix + suse10. This server is in prod
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 09:25 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
> Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > I'm getting strange messages on my new server with dovecot-1.1rc4 + lda
> > + sieve + ldap + postfix + suse10. This server is in production since
> > monday, and worked fine until today
Raphael Bittencourt S. Costa wrote:
Guys,
I'm getting strange messages on my new server with dovecot-1.1rc4 + lda
+ sieve + ldap + postfix + suse10. This server is in production since
monday, and worked fine until today. The only thing I had changed was
dovecot from 1.1rc3 to 1.1rc4. I already
Guys,
I'm getting strange messages on my new server with dovecot-1.1rc4 + lda
+ sieve + ldap + postfix + suse10. This server is in production since
monday, and worked fine until today. The only thing I had changed was
dovecot from 1.1rc3 to 1.1rc4. I already enabled mail_debug, but I got
any erro
17 matches
Mail list logo
