Daniel L. Miller wrote:
But...then I still need to get my users to not have their "Sent"
enabled or I'll have a lot of duplication. Including the users who
are using remote clients. Hah! I still want my APPEND-Sieve support!
(writing again, now with my subscribed sender address)
What is
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
While it's usually appropriate to assume I'm ignorant, naive, or
generally speaking out of my @ss, I'm afraid the responses I've
received don't answer the question I asked. I do understand how the
MUA talks to the MTA and the whole SMTP/IMAP thing. I rambled a
little
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
The question: can Dovecot be configured to support sieve filters on
IMAP (not just SMTP) operations (Eduardo helped me here - so I'll
specifically ask about the APPEND command).
It is quite funny that you bring this up right now, because as
Anders Melchiorsen wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
First - I can't argue the point about BCC'ing - you're certainly
correct that that would be the "simplest" solution in terms of
immediate implementation - if we assume users are willing to change
their habits. Since I don't - I'm exploring ser
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
First - I can't argue the point about BCC'ing - you're certainly
correct that that would be the "simplest" solution in terms of
immediate implementation - if we assume users are willing to change
their habits. Since I don't - I'm exploring server-side options
If you
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> The question: can Dovecot be configured to support sieve filters on
> IMAP (not just SMTP) operations (Eduardo helped me here - so I'll
> specifically ask about the APPEND command).
It is quite funny that you bring this up right now, because as a matter
of fact there is a
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Daniel L. Miller escreveu:
So, without changing the MUA/MTA/IMAP interaction, the IMAP server
will simply file new messages according to user-set rules. Doesn't
address the multiple-transfer issue at all, but does provide an
option for centralized control of messag
Daniel L. Miller escreveu:
So, without changing the MUA/MTA/IMAP interaction, the IMAP server
will simply file new messages according to user-set rules. Doesn't
address the multiple-transfer issue at all, but does provide an option
for centralized control of message filing.
With the APPEND c
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Daniel L. Miller escreveu:
The question: can Dovecot be configured to support sieve filters on
IMAP (not just SMTP) operations (Eduardo helped me here - so I'll
specifically ask about the APPEND command).
If not , I'll make that a feature-request - "Timo, can Dove
Daniel L. Miller escreveu:
The question: can Dovecot be configured to support sieve filters on
IMAP (not just SMTP) operations (Eduardo helped me here - so I'll
specifically ask about the APPEND command).
If not , I'll make that a feature-request - "Timo, can Dovecot be
modified to support s
Patrick Nagel wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:38:19 -0700, "Daniel L. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
My understanding is that sending a message from a client (use
Thunderbird for simplicity of this conversation) is performed via SMTP.
Saving a copy into a sent folder is performed via
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:38:19 -0700, "Daniel L. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My understanding is that sending a message from a client (use
> Thunderbird for simplicity of this conversation) is performed via SMTP.
> Saving a copy into a sent folder is performed via IMAP (hence the
>
on 7-28-2008 9:38 AM Daniel L. Miller spake the following:
I know I could test this - but I'd rather ask first. To my knowledge,
we haven't come up with a good server-side implementation for savings
copies of sent messages (by all means correct my ignorance in this
regard). So the typical way
Daniel L. Miller escreveu:
My understanding is that sending a message from a client (use
Thunderbird for simplicity of this conversation) is performed via
SMTP. Saving a copy into a sent folder is performed via IMAP (hence
the multiple transfers to the server). Now that I've laid a
backgroun
I know I could test this - but I'd rather ask first. To my knowledge,
we haven't come up with a good server-side implementation for savings
copies of sent messages (by all means correct my ignorance in this
regard). So the typical way is to enable it in clients like Thunderbird
(this prompted
15 matches
Mail list logo
