Words by Giuliano Gavazzi [Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:51:28AM +0100]:
>
> On T 5 Feb, 2009, at 00:13 , Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> For Maildir message files incomplete messages aren't just unlikely,
>> they're never possible.
>
> I was implying Maildir of course. I am not familiar with the
> specifica
On T 5 Feb, 2009, at 00:13 , Timo Sirainen wrote:
For Maildir message files incomplete messages aren't just unlikely,
they're never possible.
I was implying Maildir of course. I am not familiar with the
specification though. Does it require files to be written initially in
tmp to be moved
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 00:05 +0100, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
> > I can imagine that one could end up in the backup copy with an
> > incomplete/corrupt file (but this will be fixed in the next rsync,
> > hopefully), but I don't see how rsync could corrupt the original files
> > in the mail server.
>
On T 3 Feb, 2009, at 18:40 , Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
So you're rsyncing a live mail system with no problems?
I do it every day for backups. :-)
I've been tempted to start doing this, but I was under the
impression it
could be risky (cause file corruption)?
I
Charles Marcus wrote:
> So you're rsyncing a live mail system with no problems?
>
I do it every day for backups. :-)
> I've been tempted to start doing this, but I was under the impression it
> could be risky (cause file corruption)?
>
I can imagine that one could end up in the backup copy
On 2/3/2009, Jose Celestino (j...@co.sapo.pt) wrote:
> I'm rsyncing a live mail system so that I have a smaller downtime when
> doing the final rsync (that is always done with the system down, of
> course).
Have you ever had issues with collisions? Meaning, rsync tries to copy a
file that is being
Words by Charles Marcus [Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:08:46AM -0500]:
> On 2/2/2009 7:30 PM, Jose Celestino wrote:
> >>> I just migrated from dovecot 1.0.rc29 to 1.1.7, from Sparc platform to
> >>> Intel, it went very well.
>
> >> rsync would be simpler.
>
> > Indeed. We always do a
> >
> > rsync now
On 2/2/2009 7:30 PM, Jose Celestino wrote:
>>> I just migrated from dovecot 1.0.rc29 to 1.1.7, from Sparc platform to
>>> Intel, it went very well.
>> rsync would be simpler.
> Indeed. We always do a
>
> rsync now
> rsync then
> rsync just another time
> stop everything, rsync final, start every
Words by mouss [Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:07:19PM +0100]:
> Peter Lindgren a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I just migrated from dovecot 1.0.rc29 to 1.1.7, from Sparc platform to
> > Intel, it went very well.
>
> rsync would be simpler.
Indeed. We always do a
rsync now
rsync then
rsync just another time
stop
Peter Lindgren a écrit :
> Hi,
> I just migrated from dovecot 1.0.rc29 to 1.1.7, from Sparc platform to
> Intel, it went very well.
> In the process I merged folders and excluded folders from being copied.
> User rights on folders were kept/set.
> I thought I'd share my migration script with you fo
Peter Lindgren skrev:
I thought I'd share my migration script with you folks. If there's an
interest to put it on the wiki I can do that, but I'm not sure in what
page.
Slight bug: The script didn't create a Trash folder.
Add the following rows before the echo " done." row in the user folder lo
Hi,
I just migrated from dovecot 1.0.rc29 to 1.1.7, from Sparc platform to
Intel, it went very well.
In the process I merged folders and excluded folders from being copied.
User rights on folders were kept/set.
I thought I'd share my migration script with you folks. If there's an
interest to put i
12 matches
Mail list logo