Re: [Dovecot] Running 1.x and 2. x on same machine

2011-05-11 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 11.5.2011, at 21.58, email builder wrote: >>> Do both versions install the same binaries? >> >> No, but as long as you don't use the other one's extra binaries it >> doesn't matter. > > OK, great. I assume you mean as long as I only use /usr/local/sbin/dovecot > to > start the IMAP serve

Re: [Dovecot] Running 1.x and 2. x on same machine

2011-05-11 Thread email builder
> > When building from source, is it possible to use "make install" to switch > > between version 1.x and 2.x on the same machine (just for testing)? > > I do that all the time. > > > Do both versions install the same binaries? > > No, but as long as you don't use the other one's extra

Re: [Dovecot] Running 1.x and 2. x on same machine

2011-05-11 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 00:21 -0700, email builder wrote: > Hello, > > When building from source, is it possible to use "make install" to switch > between version 1.x and 2.x on the same machine (just for testing)? I do that all the time. > Do both versions install the same binaries? No, but a

[Dovecot] Running 1.x and 2. x on same machine

2011-05-11 Thread email builder
Hello, When building from source, is it possible to use "make install" to switch between version 1.x and 2.x on the same machine (just for testing)? Do both versions install the same binaries? Is configuration from 2.x backward compatible with 1.x? (so we can have the newest configuration fil