On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Ah, well, your original email never mentioned phones :-). In that case
> UUCP is not going to work well.
>
> I was assuming that Bob (and everyone else) has a laptop. In that case,
> he would carry his mail spool around with him, and send and
David Bishop writes:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> David Bishop writes:
>> > Is there a way to get a running transaction log from a Dovecot instance
>> to
>> > synchronize (and I use that word very, very loosely) multiple instances
>> > that don't share a network?
On 06 Dec 2013, at 21:09 , David Bishop wrote:
> If I do this with UUCP, every station is going to
> have its own copy of each message, but not copies of read flags (and no way
> of conveying that a message has been read, or, more importantly, deleted,
> which becomes a problem when some mail reci
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> David Bishop writes:
> > Is there a way to get a running transaction log from a Dovecot instance
> to
> > synchronize (and I use that word very, very loosely) multiple instances
> > that don't share a network?
>
>
I think what you want is
David Bishop writes:
> Is there a way to get a running transaction log from a Dovecot instance to
> synchronize (and I use that word very, very loosely) multiple instances
> that don't share a network?
I think what you want is not synchronize the state of one mail server
across multiple computers
On 28.11.2013, at 19.08, David Bishop wrote:
There are trams shuttling back and forth along this road (stopping at
>>> each
station), and adding a small box (such as a weatherproofed Raspberry Pi
with a wifi dongle) to transport files up and down the road is pretty
simple.
>>>
D'oh. Replied to Timo instead of to the list. Apologies!
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:07 PM, David Bishop wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 28.11.2013, at 5.17, David Bishop wrote:
>>
>> > There are trams shuttling back and forth along this road (stopping at
>
On 28.11.2013, at 5.17, David Bishop wrote:
> Is there a way to get a running transaction log from a Dovecot instance to
> synchronize (and I use that word very, very loosely) multiple instances
> that don't share a network?
dsync replication was designed in a way that would allow transferring t
Is there a way to get a running transaction log from a Dovecot instance to
synchronize (and I use that word very, very loosely) multiple instances
that don't share a network?
Why I would want to do such a thing: I have a couple way stations along a
long, winding road through very hilly country, an
