On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:07 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
> Moving the dotlock creation after a successful call to
> mail_storage_create_with_data makes everything happy, but I defer to
> you
> whether it's safe to call that before locking.
Hmm. I guess that'd work. I'm not touching v1.0 anymor
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du lundi 09 avril 2007, vers 17:03,
"Daniel L. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> It would be quite convenient to have support for multiple SSL server
> certificates, based on remote IP address. When a single IMAP server
> supports both LAN clients and WAN
Scott Silva wrote:
Brian Morrison spake the following on 4/9/2007 1:33 PM:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:16:49 -0500
Steven F Siirila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RC31 is screaming for version 1 to be released: 31 == 1 binary. :)
You're suggesting that 1.0 will be full of variable
Brian Morrison spake the following on 4/9/2007 1:33 PM:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:16:49 -0500
> Steven F Siirila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> RC31 is screaming for version 1 to be released: 31 == 1 binary. :)
>
> You're suggesting that 1.0 will be full of variable overflow bugs then?
>
> ;
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:16:49 -0500
Steven F Siirila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RC31 is screaming for version 1 to be released: 31 == 1 binary. :)
You're suggesting that 1.0 will be full of variable overflow bugs then?
;-)
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
"Arguing with
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:16:08PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz.sig
>
> mbox + NFS combination shouldn't break anymore. v1.0 still planned to
> be released next friday.
>
> - mbox: G
A feature request is not a bug, so it won't stop the 1.0 release.
I think all new feature request are being implemented in the 1.1 devel
version, so
if your feature is implemented, it will be implemented in 1.0.1 or 1.1
Oliver
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I really don't want to stand in the way of
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:03:28 -0700
"Daniel L. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't want to stand in the way of the offiicial 1.0 release,
> and I understand these RC's are intended for bug fixes, not new
> features
> - but I have a feature request anyway.
>
> It would be quite co
I really don't want to stand in the way of the offiicial 1.0 release,
and I understand these RC's are intended for bug fixes, not new features
- but I have a feature request anyway.
It would be quite convenient to have support for multiple SSL server
certificates, based on remote IP address.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz.sig
mbox + NFS combination shouldn't break anymore. v1.0 still planned to
be released next friday.
- mbox: Give "mbox file was modified while we were syncing" error
Great! So we can have 1.0 Release Party! ;)
Thanks
Oliver
Timo Sirainen wrote:
mbox + NFS combination shouldn't break anymore. v1.0 still planned to
be released next friday.
--
Oliver Schulze L. | Get my e-mail after a captcha in:
Asuncion - Paraguay | http://tinymailto.com/oliver
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz.sig
mbox + NFS combination shouldn't break anymore. v1.0 still planned to
be released next friday.
- mbox: Give "mbox file was modified while we were syncing" error only
i
12 matches
Mail list logo
