On May 19, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
Timo Sirainen пишет:
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 02:48 +0400, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
Is Binary Content Extension (rfc3516) support planned?
It's not in my near-term plans. Where are you planning on using it?
Are
there some clients that support
Timo Sirainen пишет:
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 02:48 +0400, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
Is Binary Content Extension (rfc3516) support planned?
It's not in my near-term plans. Where are you planning on using it? Are
there some clients that support it?
It may be useful in loaded web-mail applications
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 02:48 +0400, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> Is Binary Content Extension (rfc3516) support planned?
It's not in my near-term plans. Where are you planning on using it? Are
there some clients that support it?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Is Binary Content Extension (rfc3516) support planned?
--
WBR,
Anton Yuzhaninov
