> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 11:52 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The maildirsize gets recalculated. So even if Dovecot completely screws
> up updating the maildirsize file, users shouldn't see "quota exceeded"
> errors unless the recalculation is also broken.
>
> Is anything else than Dovecot deli
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 11:52 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The way this happens it seems to me that it's not just a random NFS
> locking error but actually a bug somewhere and that some users manage to
> always trigger the bug (which seems to be triggered sometimes when pop3 is
> used) while ot
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 11:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you mean that you can see a situation with QUIT or EXPUNGE command
> when maildir's contents don't match maildirsize file? Or if you mean
> only setting the deleted flags, that's normal then because nothing
> really gets deleted yet anyw
On Feb 22, 2008, at 11:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 11:03 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been doing some testing and it appears that the updating of
the
file maildirsize is sometimes delayed.
When do you see this delaying?
When I telnet manually to pop3 a
> On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 11:03 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I have been doing some testing and it appears that the updating of the
>> file maildirsize is sometimes delayed.
>
> When do you see this delaying?
>
When I telnet manually to pop3 and imap and type commands to delete
certain message
> On 2/21/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> At the moment I'm running 1.1beta14
>
> I'm sure Timo appreciates any/all help he can get, but if you are going
> to go through the trouble of running the development beta versions,
> don't you think it would make sense to always use t
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 11:03 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have been doing some testing and it appears that the updating of the
> file maildirsize is sometimes delayed.
When do you see this delaying?
> I figure this is because Dovecot collects theese changes in the
> transactions or index f
On 2/21/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At the moment I'm running 1.1beta14
I'm sure Timo appreciates any/all help he can get, but if you are going
to go through the trouble of running the development beta versions,
don't you think it would make sense to always use the late
Hi
Throughout the v. 1.1 betas I have been receiving casual reports that
quota isn't handled correctly (running Maildir).
At the moment I'm running 1.1beta14 but this has been occurring in all
other 1.1 betas as well (I don't know for sure whether this was also an
issue in 1.0, but I think so).
I
