On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 02:52:04PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 23:11 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> telnet server 143
> ? login username pass
> 1 select "anyfolder"
> 2 IDLE
> DONE
> (crash)
>
> If this is not reproducable for you, I guess I'll have to setu
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 23:11 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> telnet server 143
> ? login username pass
> 1 select "anyfolder"
> 2 IDLE
> DONE
> (crash)
>
> If this is not reproducable for you, I guess I'll have to setup some
> process debugging.
Not reproducible with me. gdb backtrace would be ni
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:44:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:15 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> This helps, thunderbird seems to act as I would expect with hidden=yes and
> list=no:
>
> 8 list "" "mail/%"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "mail/Deleted Items"
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:15 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> This helps, thunderbird seems to act as I would expect with hidden=yes and
> list=no:
>
> 8 list "" "mail/%"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "mail/Deleted Items"
Right.
> but mutt cannot access mail/ when I ask it to:
>
> set folder={lo
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:01:03PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 20:05 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> The first thing I did was to try to update my dovecot.conf from 1.0 to work
with
> 1.1. When I started dovecot 1.1 for the first time, I noticed it was
listening to
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 20:05 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> The first thing I did was to try to update my dovecot.conf from 1.0 to work
> with
> 1.1. When I started dovecot 1.1 for the first time, I noticed it was
> listening to
> 143 but not 993, even though my config was designed for ssl/tls in
I am testing dovecot 1.1 betas on a testing system, hoping to take advantage
of self repairing and NFS-capable indexes when 1.1 is sensible to put into
production. I ran into a number of issues that I did not have with 1.0,
and I think I'll just pick one or more at a time and report them rather t
