Re: [Dovecot] Performance problem with STATUS after upgrade (1.0.15 -> 1.2.2)

2009-08-03 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 10:01 +0200, Stefan Förster wrote: > after upgrading dovecot from 1.0.15 to 1.2.2 (and carefully reading > through the upgrading notes in the wiki), I got sieve, quota and fts > up and running, but I'm now suffering some kind of performance problem > with the STATUS command.

Re: [Dovecot] Performance problem with STATUS after upgrade (1.0.15 -> 1.2.2)

2009-08-03 Thread Stefan Förster
Another follow-up on my first posting: * Stefan Förster : > Those commands take almost one(!) second to complete. I've used strace to > capture what happens and made the results available at > http://www.incertum.net/~cite/imap.log. Comaring this to a 1.0.15, the main difference seems to be that

Re: [Dovecot] Performance problem with STATUS after upgrade (1.0.15 -> 1.2.2)

2009-08-03 Thread Stefan Förster
Quick follwup to myself: * Stefan Förster : > (The whole conversation is available as: > http://www.incertum.net/~cite/dovecot-snoop.log) [...] > dovecot -n (also available as: http://www.incertum.net/~cite/dovecot-n.log): I've noticed some people trying to access this URLs with the enclosing "

[Dovecot] Performance problem with STATUS after upgrade (1.0.15 -> 1.2.2)

2009-08-03 Thread Stefan Förster
Hello list, after upgrading dovecot from 1.0.15 to 1.2.2 (and carefully reading through the upgrading notes in the wiki), I got sieve, quota and fts up and running, but I'm now suffering some kind of performance problem with the STATUS command. Symptoms: Reading mail on the IMAP server itself wit