On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 10:01 +0200, Stefan Förster wrote:
> after upgrading dovecot from 1.0.15 to 1.2.2 (and carefully reading
> through the upgrading notes in the wiki), I got sieve, quota and fts
> up and running, but I'm now suffering some kind of performance problem
> with the STATUS command.
Another follow-up on my first posting:
* Stefan Förster :
> Those commands take almost one(!) second to complete. I've used strace to
> capture what happens and made the results available at
> http://www.incertum.net/~cite/imap.log.
Comaring this to a 1.0.15, the main difference seems to be that
Quick follwup to myself:
* Stefan Förster :
> (The whole conversation is available as:
> http://www.incertum.net/~cite/dovecot-snoop.log)
[...]
> dovecot -n (also available as: http://www.incertum.net/~cite/dovecot-n.log):
I've noticed some people trying to access this URLs with the enclosing
"
Hello list,
after upgrading dovecot from 1.0.15 to 1.2.2 (and carefully reading
through the upgrading notes in the wiki), I got sieve, quota and fts
up and running, but I'm now suffering some kind of performance problem
with the STATUS command.
Symptoms: Reading mail on the IMAP server itself wit