On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 20:32 +0100, Anders wrote:
> Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > Well, it's all open source, did you look at it? It shouldn't be too hard
> > to just ignore the result of include, no?
> >
>
> Yeah, I did look.
>
> I sure could patch something together. Before doing that, though, I
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Well, it's all open source, did you look at it? It shouldn't be too hard
to just ignore the result of include, no?
Yeah, I did look.
I sure could patch something together. Before doing that, though, I
hoped to be enlightened with an official way, so I would not have t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Anders wrote:
Okay, no help for having an optional include. My fallback solution is to
Well, it's all open source, did you look at it? It shouldn't be too hard
to just ignore the result of include, no?
create the personal s
Anders wrote:
I (think that I) want a global Sieve setup like this:
require ["include"];
include :global "spam.sieve";
include :personal "folders.sieve";
include :personal "vacation.sieve";
Okay, no help for having an optional include. My fallback solution is to
create the personal s
I (think that I) want a global Sieve setup like this:
require ["include"];
include :global "spam.sieve";
include :personal "folders.sieve";
include :personal "vacation.sieve";
... that does not fail if a user has not created the personal filters.
Any ideas how to do something like that?
