On 2010-08-03 6:53 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> Just an update for archives in case anyone else comes across it whilst
> debugging, they can just shrug it off as a postfix anomaly,
> I only had two replies to this post, but both of them are also seeing
> the same as I do, so nothing to worry about un
On Aug 3, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> Just an update for archives in case anyone else comes across it whilst
> debugging, they can just shrug it off as a postfix anomaly,
> I only had two replies to this post, but both of them are also seeing
> the same as I do, so nothing to worry ab
Just an update for archives in case anyone else comes across it whilst
debugging, they can just shrug it off as a postfix anomaly,
I only had two replies to this post, but both of them are also seeing
the same as I do, so nothing to worry about until postfix one decade
accepts this as a bug :)
O
Noel Butler wrote:
> (this msg is an extract from what I sent to WV some time ago, with him
> showing absolutely no interest, I got bored tonight so thought I'd throw
> it on this list since the question remains valid today)
>
> 30 Query SELECT 1 FROM virtual_domains WHERE
> name='examp
I know this unnecessary lookups question is really a postfix one, but
I'm curious if anyone else sees the behaviour of
postfix continuing looking up users after it clearly have got its answer
that it is "not a local domain" response.
(this msg is an extract from what I sent to WV some time ago,
