On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:11:25 +
Mário Barbosa wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:45:13 -0500
> Stewart Dean wrote:
>
> > Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think*
> > is no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
> >
> > I'm wondering if there is something we can te
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:45:13 -0500
Stewart Dean wrote:
> Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think*
> is no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
>
> I'm wondering if there is something we can tell users to use when
> Things Are Dire. GUI would be better since it re
Words by Timo Sirainen [Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 04:40:01PM +0200]:
> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 14:26 +, Jose Celestino wrote:
> > Words by Timo Sirainen [Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:17:11AM +0200]:
> > > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:45 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
> > > > Is there a simple robust IMAP client to
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 14:26 +, Jose Celestino wrote:
> Words by Timo Sirainen [Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:17:11AM +0200]:
> > On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:45 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
> > > Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is
> > > no longer supported)? GUI or T
Words by Timo Sirainen [Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:17:11AM +0200]:
> On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:45 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
> > Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is
> > no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
>
> Pine and Alpine are about the only clients (besi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Stewart Dean wrote:
telling me there were still 135,000 messages. In the end, I had to kill the
TBird profile for that account and recreate it.
Yeah, the first and only time I opened the Postmaster mailbox with
Thunderbird,
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 12:45 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
> Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is
> no longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
Pine and Alpine are about the only clients (besides webmails) that can
open a mailbox without downloading every single mes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:45:13PM -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
[...]
> Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is no
> longer supported)? GUI or TTY session?
I switched from Pine to Mutt (quite a while ago) and to me,
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:34 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
> With a mbox format inbox, I don't know that it
> matters much whether it's 10 files or 10,000...it's still gotta haul out
> the whole ugly thing.
Aha, mbox. And pine is your last resort (as you stated in a follow up)?
formail and procmai
> Is there a simple robust IMAP client
Yes: mutt. One of the reasons we use mutt not only for regular mail access, but
for troubleshooting: it simply does what you tell it to do. It doesn't try to
be clever or try to do what it thinks you actually wanted to do.
Apart from that, it's scriptable an
On 12/15/2008, Stewart Dean (sd...@bard.edu) wrote:
> I would like Tbird to do just what it does now, but be more robust
> (and maybe a little quicker) about it. Bombproof, as they say.
I'm with you there, and I've read that the new 3.0 will have a lot of
IMAP improvements, but haven't tried it ye
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/15/2008 2:34 PM, Stewart Dean wrote:
Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of the two messages,
and deleted 65,000, but after that it locked up.
I'd never try to delete that many at once...
It very likely wasn't locked up though, it probab
On 12/15/2008 2:34 PM, Stewart Dean wrote:
>>> Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of the two messages,
>>> and deleted 65,000, but after that it locked up.
>> I'd never try to delete that many at once...
>>
>> It very likely wasn't locked up though, it probably was working
>> furiousl
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/15/2008, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of the two messages,
and deleted 65,000, but after that it locked up.
I'd never try to delete that many at once...
It very likely wasn't locked up though, it proba
On 12/15/2008, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
>> Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of the two messages,
>> and deleted 65,000, but after that it locked up.
I'd never try to delete that many at once...
It very likely wasn't locked up though, it probably was working
furiously to t
Hi
> This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
> after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
> messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
> postmaster alias.
By far the fastest option is to simply use a tool which can
Stewart Dean schrieb:
This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
postmaster alias. Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one
* Stewart Dean :
> This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
> after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
> messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
> postmaster alias. Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of
Stewart Dean wrote:
This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
postmaster alias. Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of
This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
postmaster alias. Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one of
the two messages, a
20 matches
Mail list logo
