* Timo Sirainen :
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:51 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > XLIST seems to be pretty proprietary. Have you had a look at LIST-EXTENDED
> > instead?
>
> See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg/current/msg00208.html
> thread, especially
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-arc
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:51 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> XLIST seems to be pretty proprietary. Have you had a look at LIST-EXTENDED
> instead?
See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg/current/msg00208.html
thread, especially
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/morg/current/msg00212.h
Timo,
* Rob Middleton :
> On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client sho
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Robert Schetterer :
but with autocreate and global sieve rules you can implement a pseudo
standart
i use tbs one and configure horde/imp like tb does it, in my meaning
big players have no intension bring up even a pseudo standart
cause they
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
Worse than this, most IMAP clients auto-
* Robert Schetterer :
> >> but with autocreate and global sieve rules you can implement a pseudo
> >> standart
> >> i use tbs one and configure horde/imp like tb does it, in my meaning
> >> big players have no intension bring up even a pseudo standart
> >> cause they want users to use their own mai
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:33:21PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Axel Thimm schrieb:
> > Given than you seem to bless Apple Mail folder structures it makes it
> > a good candidate to try to push as a standard for others to
> > copy. Maybe there could be example setups/configs shipped with
* Ed W :
> Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
>>
>> Worse than this,
* Rob Middleton :
> On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
> >message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
> >common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should han
Axel Thimm schrieb:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>
>>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
On 26/09/2009 6:40 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a so
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:40:21AM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> >
> >> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Has anyone seen an app
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:55:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
from a users
poi
Rob Middleton schrieb:
> On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with
>> typical
>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least
>> there's no
>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Robert Schetterer :
>> Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
>>> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
>>> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
>>> common sense on a naming convention that tells how
On 25/09/2009 11:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
XLIST may de
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> * Charles Marcus :
>> On 9/25/2009, Stefan Förster (cite+dovecot-us...@incertum.net) wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a
users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
>>> Tried
* Stefan Förster :
> * Patrick Ben Koetter :
> > * Timo Sirainen :
> >> No. And one of the first commands they typically do is LIST. So
> >> there are no good ways to solve this.
> >
> > I suspected that.
> >
> > Would it be possible to identify a client by the folders it tries to
> > subscribe
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> * Timo Sirainen :
>> No. And one of the first commands they typically do is LIST. So
>> there are no good ways to solve this.
>
> I suspected that.
>
> Would it be possible to identify a client by the folders it tries to subscribe
> to?
You could, of course, have a list
* Robert Schetterer :
> Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> > It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
> > message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
> > common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle
> > this.
* Timo Sirainen :
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> >Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >>>Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the
> >>>problem from a users
> >>>point of view? A server side alias list that maps
* Charles Marcus :
> On 9/25/2009, Stefan Förster (cite+dovecot-us...@incertum.net) wrote:
> >> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a
> >> users
> >> point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
>
> > Tried that, didn't work out that g
Patrick Ben Koetter schrieb:
> It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
> message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
> common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
>
> Worse than this, most IMAP cli
On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
from a users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server
standard?
Symlinks maybe
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from
a users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
Symlinks maybe? Or something similar done internally. The main p
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem
from a users
point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server
standard?
Symlinks maybe? Or something similar done internally. The main problem
would anywa
On 9/25/2009, Stefan Förster (cite+dovecot-us...@incertum.net) wrote:
>> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a
>> users
>> point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
> Tried that, didn't work out that great (users got confused by 12
* Patrick Ben Koetter :
> Has anyone seen an approach or a solution that solves the problem from a users
> point of view? A server side alias list that maps to a server standard?
Tried that, didn't work out that great (users got confused by 12
dozillion "sent" folders).
As for know, I auto-subscr
It seems that there is no standard for folder names that deal with typical
message classes such as drafts, outbox, sent, spam etc. At least there's no
common sense on a naming convention that tells how client should handle this.
Worse than this, most IMAP clients auto-create folders according to t
29 matches
Mail list logo
