Re: [Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-05 Thread Jeff Grossman
Timo Sirainen wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: So, what would have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the phone think all of the messages are ol

Re: [Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:27 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: > Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: > > > >> So, what would > >> have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the > >> phone think all of the messages are older than 30 day

Re: [Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-05 Thread Jeff Grossman
Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: So, what would have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the phone think all of the messages are older than 30 days? Is it using SORT command? Apparently there are some bugs still in it.

Re: [Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:12 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: > So, what would > have changed between version 1.0.5 and 1.1beta2 to somehow make the > phone think all of the messages are older than 30 days? Is it using SORT command? Apparently there are some bugs still in it. http://dovecot.org/bugrep

Re: [Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-03 Thread Ed W
Okay, I feel pretty stupid now. It was not a problem with namespaces at all. But, I think there is a problem somewhere. I had the phone setup to display the last 30 days of messages. When I would sync it up, it did not display any messages. That is why I thought something was messed up w

Re: [Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-02 Thread Jeff Grossman
Jeff Grossman wrote: I looked through all of the 1.1 announcements and did not see it. I also looked at the wiki page talking about the 1.0 to 1.1 upgrade, nothing there. I think the windows mobile device is looking for an INBOX. prefix where my other setup (Thunderbird, Outlook, and Squirrelma

Re: [Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-02 Thread Jeff Grossman
> Jeff Grossman wrote: >> I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running >> with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with >> a >> vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old >> dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, b

Re: [Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-02 Thread Ed W
Jeff Grossman wrote: I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with a vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could be m

[Dovecot] Namespace Question

2007-10-02 Thread Jeff Grossman
I installed 1.1Beta2 over 1.0.5 last night. My 1.0.5 setup was running with no problems at all. Stupid me overwrote my dovecot.conf file with a vanilla one. I know I know, backup!!! I am pretty sure my old dovecot.conf file did not specify any namespaces, but I could be mistaken. My Thunderbir