On 14.6.2013, at 22.31, Jonathon Price wrote:
> If having a single seen flag for the mailboxs was preferred, i.e. no
> private indexes. Is there a recommended mail store format that would work
> best with higher levels of concurrent access?
Anything but mbox works fine.
Don't think the passdb would work as I was planning on using LDAP for
authentication. Also if this option was used I'm assuming it would effect
the username used in any logging.
If having a single seen flag for the mailboxs was preferred, i.e. no
private indexes. Is there a recommended mail store
On Jun 13, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The \Seen flag could be made per-user, preferrably with v2.2's INDEXPVT
> setting. Otherwise you'd have to use maildir and you'd have to manually
> create a dovecot-shared file to each such maildir (every time a new one is
> created).
Is the
On 14.6.2013, at 5.38, Jonathon Price wrote:
> I'm designing a system where some but not all groups of users want to share
> a single mailbox, i.e the user will not have there own inbox. I think this
> is possible by setting up a user database that returns the same mail
> location and possible th
I'm designing a system where some but not all groups of users want to share
a single mailbox, i.e the user will not have there own inbox. I think this
is possible by setting up a user database that returns the same mail
location and possible the same home directory. This sharing would only
occur in
