On 7/30/2009, Stephen Vaughan (stephenvaug...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Jul 30 01:00:48 asura qmail-scanner-queue.pl: qmail-scanner[32365]:
> Policy:Bad_MIME:RC:
If you read the thread where this was declared fixed, it specifically
said something about the MIME body being broken...
Easiest way to tell
I might be confused also, I haven't been able to receive an automated
vacation reply yet.. both gmail and my mail servers block mail from the auto
reply. This is what shows up in the mail logs on one my servers:
Jul 30 01:00:48 asura qmail-scanner-queue.pl: qmail-scanner[32365]:
Policy:Bad_MIME:RC
On 7/30/2009, Stephen Vaughan (stephenvaug...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Does the fix apply to dovecot 1.1 only? We are running 1.0, should we be
> upgrading to 1.2?
1.0 is old... so yes, you should upgrade... lots more reasons than this
one bugfix, for sure...
But... I'm confused about the bug...
The
Does the fix apply to dovecot 1.1 only? We are running 1.0, should we be
upgrading to 1.2?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:59 AM, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
>
> Is this ever likely to be fixed in dovecot?
>>
> ..
>
>> <<>@domain1.com>
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:59 AM, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
Is this ever likely to be fixed in dovecot?
..
<<>@domain1.com>
Stephen
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yeah, it was fixed a week after my mail:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-sieve-1.1/rev/49537bad6797
Hello,
Is this ever likely to be fixed in dovecot?
It was mentioned in a previous thread before:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-December/035753.html
Basically the vacation system is useless, most mail servers with anti-spam
are rejecting the vacation replies because the sender isn't a vali
Are you sure it's because of a missing return path? Sounds more like the
message MIME body is broken. I've never checked if it is..
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:19 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> The vacation auto reply is being rejected by spamassassin, for
> bad_MIME
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:1
The vacation auto reply is being rejected by spamassassin, for bad_MIME
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Pretty much the same thing, just replace "rejection" with "vacation" in
> my reply. Why do you want them to have the return path?
>
> On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:15 +1100,
Pretty much the same thing, just replace "rejection" with "vacation" in
my reply. Why do you want them to have the return path?
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:15 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> I was talking about vacation auto-reply messages missing the return
> path
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:41
I was talking about vacation auto-reply messages missing the return path
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:09 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> > I can see this has been discussed previously, was just wondering if it's
> > been fixed in v1.1.x?
>
> I
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 14:09 +1100, Stephen Vaughan wrote:
> I can see this has been discussed previously, was just wondering if it's
> been fixed in v1.1.x?
I don't consider it a bug. Rejection messages shouldn't have a return
path, otherwise they themselves may be rejected and soon you'll have a
Hi,
I can see this has been discussed previously, was just wondering if it's
been fixed in v1.1.x?
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
12 matches
Mail list logo
