On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 13:42 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> c) Prefer to put user's connections to same process, but don't require
> it.
This + async io as described in my other recent "plan" mail should make
it possible to handle hundreds of connections in a process without I/O
waits. And combined
Maybe for v2.1:
imap and pop3 processes can currently handle multiple connections, but
they're assigned pretty much randomly to processes. It would be better
if it was possible to:
a) Require that a process handles only a specific user's connections
b) Require that a process handles only a speci
