On 11/8/2012 8:11 μμ, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Writing you a complete design document for doing this is beyond the
scope of a mailing list thread. There exists plenty of documentation on
the web. You will have to do your own research, but I've pointed you in
the right direction.
Thank you Stan a
On 08/11/2012 01:18 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/11/2012 11:52 AM, Daniel Parthey wrote:
Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 10/8/2012 4:47 πμ, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
That begs the question,
what is your definition of a "Highly Available Mail Server"? What is it
that you actually want to accomplish?
On 8/11/2012 11:52 AM, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>> On 10/8/2012 4:47 πμ, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> That begs the question,
>>> what is your definition of a "Highly Available Mail Server"? What is it
>>> that you actually want to accomplish? In some detail please.
>>
>> 1. U
On 8/11/2012 8:02 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> 1. Under normal conditions, mail2.example.com is a full mirror of
> mail1.example.com; when any mail message is added/viewed/moved/removed
> etc. to any user's folder or any folder is added/viewed/moved/removed
> etc. at mail1.example.com, we want it t
Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 10/8/2012 4:47 πμ, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> >That begs the question,
> >what is your definition of a "Highly Available Mail Server"? What is it
> >that you actually want to accomplish? In some detail please.
>
> 1. Under normal conditions, mail2.example.com is a full
On 10/8/2012 4:47 πμ, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
That begs the question,
what is your definition of a "Highly Available Mail Server"? What is it
that you actually want to accomplish? In some detail please.
OK, I'll make it as much as possible accurate.
Let's skip all the network stuff and see a p
Torsdag 9. august 2012 20.47.50 skrev Stan Hoeppner:
[snip]
> To be quite frank, based upon the level of technical acumen you've
> demonstrated here, and the general financial position Greece finds
> itself in, and the fact you're a public institution, it seems you're a
> much better candidate fo
On 8/9/2012 9:58 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We would like to implement a Highly Available Mail Server and would like
> to ask advice on how to architect this.
>
> Some details on our setup:
>
> Currently we have only one internal mail server (Postfix/Dovecot 2.0 -
> planning to move to
Hi,
We would like to implement a Highly Available Mail Server and would like
to ask advice on how to architect this.
Some details on our setup:
Currently we have only one internal mail server (Postfix/Dovecot 2.0 -
planning to move to 2.1), receiving mail from a gateway server
(filtering sp
