Re: [Dovecot] Fwd: dovecot bug report (64 bit file offsets)

2007-11-27 Thread Marcus Rueckert
On 2007-11-27 14:15:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I agree that it’s kind strange behavior. > > Also I’ve googled that exactly the same errors (unexpected eof > found … on file ‘UNOPENED’) were related to mysql. > But how mysql compile options might affect configuration file parsing > and r

Re: [Dovecot] Fwd: dovecot bug report (64 bit file offsets)

2007-11-27 Thread markevich
I agree that it’s kind strange behavior. Also I’ve googled that exactly the same errors (unexpected eof found … on file ‘UNOPENED’) were related to mysql. But how mysql compile options might affect configuration file parsing and read/write operations? (indexes for example) Does any one have any i

Re: [Dovecot] Fwd: dovecot bug report (64 bit file offsets)

2007-11-27 Thread Marcus Rueckert
On 2007-11-27 11:21:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have found similar problem: > http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-January/018623.html > "After configure remove HAVE_PREAD from config.h, recompile and see > if it works." > > I think I figured out where might be the problem. If th

[Dovecot] Fwd: dovecot bug report (64 bit file offsets)

2007-11-27 Thread markevich
I have found similar problem: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-January/018623.html "After configure remove HAVE_PREAD from config.h, recompile and see if it works." I think I figured out where might be the problem. If the binary is compiled in the 64bit environment and you want to use