On 23.11.2012, at 13.54, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> Problem: We have some folders (eg, Trash) appearing both as sibling folders
> to INBOX and as subfolders to INBOX. We want them only to appear at the
> sibling level.
You're breaking all the assumptions that IMAP clients can make about mailbox
name
Problem: We have some folders (eg, Trash) appearing both as sibling folders
to INBOX and as subfolders to INBOX. We want them only to appear at the
sibling level.
In order to put some folders (Sent, Trash, some others) at a peer
level to INBOX, and all other folders under INBOX, we've defined
name
Am 16.11.2012 11:36, schrieb Keith Edmunds:
>> read
>>
>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration
>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Namespaces
>
> Thank you: I have (already had) read both.
>
> Are you suggesting that hidden namespaces will provide the functionality
> we are looking for? Or have I missed th
> read
>
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Namespaces
Thank you: I have (already had) read both.
Are you suggesting that hidden namespaces will provide the functionality
we are looking for? Or have I missed the point?
Thanks,
Keith
Am 16.11.2012 10:33, schrieb Keith Edmunds:
> # dovecot --version
> 1.2.15
>
> We're trying to migrate a server from Cyrus to Dovecot, and we're mostly
> there.
>
> On Cyrus, the folder layout in the MUA is:
>
> INBOX
> subfolder
> subfolder
> ...
> Sent
> Drafts
> Queue
> Trash
>
> Users ca
# dovecot --version
1.2.15
We're trying to migrate a server from Cyrus to Dovecot, and we're mostly
there.
On Cyrus, the folder layout in the MUA is:
INBOX
subfolder
subfolder
...
Sent
Drafts
Queue
Trash
Users cannot create sibling folders to the Inbox, only subfolders (and
sub-subfolders, e
