> Well, does the port 389 work then? It's mentioned there only because
> someone complained that 389 didn't work.. Perhaps because it required
> TLS? Or something, I don't know.
I will have to play with it some. Just switching to port 389 really
slowed everything down and may have caused some othe
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 15:28 -0400, Mark Schaub wrote:
> It might be worth updating the wiki to mention the reasoning behind
> using port 3268 and the implications it can cause.
Well, does the port 389 work then? It's mentioned there only because
someone complained that 389 didn't work.. Perhaps be
> Then there's something different what Dovecot and ldapsearch does. They
> have the same dn, dnpass, neither uses tls, same base, deref, scope?
>
I figured it out, there certainly is something different! The
AuthDatabase/LDAP documentation on the Dovecot Wiki says "When
connecting to AD, use port
