Timo Sirainen wrote:
> If you can't kill a process even with kill -9, the problem is with the
> kernel and Dovecot can't do much about it.
exactly - the process seems to be waiting for device. I suspect
rpc.lockd to be the sinner. With the NFS beeing an EMC system, my means
of debugging on the se
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:37 +0200, Søren Schrøder wrote:
> The pop3 process is un-killable, and I end up stacking up pop3 processes
> from the user, as well as deliver to the user. Not healthy.. I was under
> the impression that POP3 would exit when a lock is set, preventing more
> than one pop3 p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 4/4/2008, Søren Schrøder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> * dovecot 1.0.x
>
> Is exact version a secret? ;)
Absolutely not: 1.0.10
I was just stating that i didn't go 1.1 track
> Also, output of dovecot -n is usually helpful...
Here goes:
# 1.0.1
On 4/4/2008, Søren Schrøder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* dovecot 1.0.x
Is exact version a secret? ;)
Also, output of dovecot -n is usually helpful...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Greetings dovecot mailing list.
I have implemented a relatively big dovecot setup (250k users) and
overall I am very pleased with dovecot functionality and performance.
Setup description:
* dovecot 1.0.x
* FreeBSD 6.3
* Postfix (using dovecot deliver as LDA).
* OpenLdap backend
* Storage is
