On 31/03/2024 13:33 EEST Marc wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] [dovecot-2.1.15] mdbox corruption,
doveadm force-
resync can't repair it (throws segfault)
Are you sure it is not something else, your message is even
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] [dovecot-2.1.15] mdbox corruption, doveadm force-
> resync can't repair it (throws segfault)
>
Are you sure it is not something else, your message is even empty.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
On 2019-04-19 15:26, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Unfortunately we have quite long list of things to do, so sometimes
even trivial things can take a long time.
Not to hijack the thread, but perhaps you could elaborate on what has
changed within Dovecot?
Timo seems to be put in the backgro
Unfortunately we have quite long list of things to do, so sometimes even trivial things can take a long time.
Aki
On 18 April 2019 16:53 Tanstaafl via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
Sadly, I gue
Sadly, I guess not...
I'm not sure what to make of this, seeing as both Wietse and Timo said
it was almost a trivial thing to fix.
On Fri Apr 12 2019 12:17:22 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl
via dovecot wrote:
> I'm resurrecting this again because I'm getting pretty close to possibly
I'm resurrecting this again because I'm getting pretty close to possibly
being ready to install a brand new dovecot server (finally), but I still
need for dovecots LMTP to add the x-original-to header.
So... was this completed quietly, or is support for it still not there?
Thanks,
Charles
On Tu
th to sysconfig, not dovecotconfig.
>> doveconf -Pn > dovecot-new.conf
>> doveconf: Fatal: open(/etc/dovecot/dovecot/dovecot.conf) failed: No such
>> file or directory
>>
>> I can make a symlink, but first I'd like to know is this a bug or
>> misconfiguration.
>>
>>
> Hajo
--
Mart
Hello,
Am 07.11.2018 um 14:04 schrieb Mart Pirita:
Hi,
Build options - --sysconfdir=/etc/dovecot
you should use --sysconfdir=/etc
sysconfig is path to sysconfig, not dovecotconfig.
doveconf -Pn > dovecot-new.conf
doveconf: Fatal: open(/etc/dovecot/dovecot/dovecot.conf) failed: No s
Hi,
Build options - --sysconfdir=/etc/dovecot
doveconf -Pn > dovecot-new.conf
doveconf: Fatal: open(/etc/dovecot/dovecot/dovecot.conf) failed: No such
file or directory
I can make a symlink, but first I'd like to know is this a bug or
misconfiguration.
--
Mart
On 9 Jun 2017, at 16.29, geoffroy desvernay wrote:
>
> dovecot: master: Panic: kevent() failed: Invalid argument
[EINVAL] The specified time limit or filter is invalid.
Because this was the main kevent() call, I think it means that the time limit
was invalid. But I wonder what e
I believe this is fixed in the latest ports (2.2.30.2)
> On 05/21/2011 17:54, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 21.5.2011, at 2.51, Henrik
> Larsson wrote: > >> That patch doesn't fix
> anything. It only changes the error message to be more informative so I could
> figure out what is causing it.
On 05/21/2011 17:54, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.5.2011, at 2.51, Henrik Larsson wrote:
>
>>
That patch doesn't fix anything. It only changes the error message to be
more informative so I could figure out what is causing it. If you haven't
seen any more errors, it's just a coinci
Hey James,
I did make progress, however, I have dropped the code that I was working on
in favor of Joshua Atkins' work on fts-elasticsearch.
Check it out here: https://github.com/ascendantcom/fts-elasticsearch/
Regards,
Tim
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:09:12 +1000 James Devine wrote
> T
On 4/28/2015 1:40 PM, Tobias Franzén wrote:
> On 2014-01-08 14:32, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote:
> LMTP adds a new Delivered-To: header when there is
> a single RCPT TO. You can force a single RCPT TO
On 2014-01-08 14:32, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote:
LMTP adds a new Delivered-To: header when there is
a single RCPT TO. You can force a single RCPT TO from Postfix side by
setting lmtp_destination_recipient_limit
Tim,
Had you made any progress on this? We've been using elasticsearch to index
our mail backup for a while now and I am interested in possibly using it to
index our live mail as well.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Tim Groeneveld wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > I would like to
> >> On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >>> That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
> >>> mails in his inbox.
I had the same problem with a corrupted IBM Domino mailfile which gave me lots
of duplicates, however imapsync with the options "--useheader Date
Jiri Bourek:
As I understand it, any program using the library has compression
turned off by default.
yes,
and any program using an older library version can turn off
compression now, too.
On 3.7.2014 21:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.6.2014, at 14.05, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
mails in his inbox.
Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
It sure would be nice if
On 3.7.2014 23:55, A. Schulze wrote:
Timo Sirainen:
But now I'm wondering if no-compression should be enabled by default?..
to not potential break something I would not change the default now
but maybe later...
Thanks!
Andreas
Not sure if it's upstream change, but Debian disabled compress
Timo Sirainen:
But now I'm wondering if no-compression should be enabled by default?..
to not potential break something I would not change the default now
but maybe later...
Thanks!
Andreas
On 20.5.2014, at 22.49, Andreas Schulze wrote:
> Jiri Bourek:
>> Well they seem to know what they are talking about. The description
>> of the threat in linked screenshot says "attacker needs to have
>> ability to submit any plain text"
>
> I wrote the attached patch to add SSL_OP_NO_COMPRESSION
On 10.6.2014, at 14.05, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
>> mails in his inbox.
>
> Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
>
> It sure would be nice if dovecot could perform this on
On 6/10/2014 12:32 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Charles Marcus:
>On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
> >mails in his inbox.
>
>Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
To duplicate the mails?
'This' refer
> Wasn't there a thread some days/weeks ago, that Pigeonhole behaves the
> same by default and the poster asked how long the timeframe is Pigeonhole
> remembers the ids?
How would I go about enabling this?
> Actually, I still wonder about whether or not the same message-id is
> sufficient to
> The basic question is: what is a duplicate?
>
> I spot 100% duplicates within the same Maildir mailbox with a script
> similiar to "fdupes" http://linux.die.net/man/1/fdupes .
> Because an user may copy messages around, I scan one mailbox at a time.
But with mdbox? Or mailboxes != Maildir form
* Charles Marcus :
> On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
> >mails in his inbox.
>
> Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
To duplicate the mails? Yeah: Just let fetchmail run unobserved for
weeks, will fuck up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.06.2014 15:39, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.06.2014 15:17, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
The basic question is: what is a duplicate?
However, neither script I wou
Am 10.06.2014 15:39, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 10.06.2014 15:17, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
>>> The basic question is: what is a duplicate?
>>> However, neither script I would call general enough for automatic processing
>
>> dbmail has just "suppress_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.06.2014 15:17, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
mai
Am 10.06.2014 15:17, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
>>> mails in his inbox.
>
>> Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
>
>> It su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
mails in his inbox.
Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
It sure would be nice if
On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!)
mails in his inbox.
Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this?
It sure would be nice if dovecot could perform this on a per account
and/or per maildir/mailbox case with a simple
* Timo Sirainen :
> > Why would that happen? (dovecot 2.1.17)
>
> Difficult to say. It could be munmap()ing memory allocations or it
> could be munmap()ing Dovecot index files. Weren't there equivalent
> number of mmap() calls?..
>
> BTW. In v2.2 the index file handling is faster for LDA/LMTP be
On 8.6.2014, at 11.59, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I observed several long running dovecot/lmtp processes hogging the
> CPU. I then strace'd them (strace -c -p 6375) and found them
> munmap()-ing a lot:
>
> % time seconds usecs/call callserrors syscall
> -- --- ---
I observed several long running dovecot/lmtp processes hogging the
CPU. I then strace'd them (strace -c -p 6375) and found them
munmap()-ing a lot:
% time seconds usecs/call callserrors syscall
-- --- --- - -
97.18 19.592537
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
in dovecot documentation i try to implement quota per users.
i added dovecot-ldap.conf file
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home, uidNumber=uid, gidNumber=gid,
mailbox=mail, quota=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$
and i see
When I try to create a new folder in
>"Public" (i don't have rights, but i can try) loooks like the process crash:
>May 12 23:10:07 imap: Debug: Module loaded:
>/usr/lib/dovecot/lib01_acl_plugin.so May 12 23:10:07 imap: Debug: Module
loy >12 23:10:07 imap(Mihai.*Badic
> callback = 0x42909f , failure_callback =
> 0x429275 , request_auth_token = 1}
> service_flags = MASTER_SERVICE_FLAG_KEEP_CONFIG_OPEN
> storage_service_flags = MAIL_STORAGE_SERVICE_FLAG_DISALLOW_ROOT
> username = 0x0
> c = -1
That means dovecot try to fi
On Wednesday 14 May 2014 08:31:57 you wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 May 2014 01:02:28 you wrote:
>
Finally i found time to build another machine and try to debug :
I found my slackbuild stripped the debug symbols so i made some changes and :
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
gt; location =
> mailbox Drafts {
>auto = subscribe
>special_use = \Drafts
> }
> mailbox Sent {
>auto = subscribe
>special_use = \Sent
> }
> mailbox Trash {
>auto = subscribe
>special_use = \Trash
> }
> mailbox badh
adh {
auto = subscribe
special_use = \Junk
}
mailbox spam {
auto = subscribe
special_use = \Junk
}
prefix =
}
passdb {
args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext
driver = ldap
}
plugin {
fts = lucene
fts_lucene = whitespace_chars=@.+
mail_log_events = delete undelete e
agesieve_notify_capability = mailto
managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope
encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric
relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify
environment mailbox date ihave
passdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf
driver = ldap
+1 roundcube/managesieve
On Jun 2, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Bubreg István wrote:
> I'm using roundcube for this, it has a 'managesieve' plugin which works
> with dovecot well.
>
>
> 2014-06-02 15:35 GMT+02:00 Jos Chrispijn :
>
>> Can someone explain how I can create message rules to use with this
>>
02.06.2014 16:11, Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 02.06.2014 15:55, schrieb Jos Chrispijn:
>> Bubreg István:
>>> I'm using roundcube for this, it has a 'managesieve' plugin
>>> which works with dovecot well.
>> Do you mean that I can create rules with Roundcube and have them
>> processed by Dovecot without
Am 02.06.2014 15:55, schrieb Jos Chrispijn:
> Bubreg István:
>> I'm using roundcube for this, it has a 'managesieve' plugin which works
>> with dovecot well.
> Do you mean that I can create rules with Roundcube and have them processed by
> Dovecot without having to open
> Roundcube itself (or an
Looking at mail_filter_mailbox_allocated() of
src/plugins/mail-filter/mail-filter-plugin.c:
if ((class_flags & MAIL_STORAGE_CLASS_FLAG_OPEN_STREAMS) == 0 &&
(class_flags & MAIL_STORAGE_CLASS_FLAG_BINARY_DATA) != 0 &&
muser->out_socket_path != NULL)
Bubreg István:
I'm using roundcube for this, it has a 'managesieve' plugin which works
with dovecot well.
Do you mean that I can create rules with Roundcube and have them
processed by Dovecot without having to open Roundcube itself (or any
other mailclient) to process these rules? Thant would b
I'm using roundcube for this, it has a 'managesieve' plugin which works
with dovecot well.
2014-06-02 15:35 GMT+02:00 Jos Chrispijn :
> Can someone explain how I can create message rules to use with this
> version of Dovecot? I specially switched to this version because it
> supports then Pigeon
Can someone explain how I can create message rules to use with this
version of Dovecot? I specially switched to this version because it
supports then Pigeonhole Sieve. I would like to volunteer to contribute
as a volunteer when someone would like to create a html driven user
interface that prov
Am 31.05.2014 19:57, schrieb Christian Hoffmann:
Am 31.05.2014 19:50, schrieb Pascal Volk:
On 05/31/2014 05:35 PM Christian Hoffmann wrote:
Hello Pascal,
but I didn't configure a userdb with driver=ldap. There is only one
userdb with driver=static and I assumed, that every user gets the same
Am 31.05.2014 19:50, schrieb Pascal Volk:
On 05/31/2014 05:35 PM Christian Hoffmann wrote:
Hello Pascal,
but I didn't configure a userdb with driver=ldap. There is only one
userdb with driver=static and I assumed, that every user gets the same
uid, gid and a valid home directory.
Are there som
On 05/31/2014 05:35 PM Christian Hoffmann wrote:
> Hello Pascal,
>
> but I didn't configure a userdb with driver=ldap. There is only one
> userdb with driver=static and I assumed, that every user gets the same
> uid, gid and a valid home directory.
>
> Are there some circumstances, that differe
Hello Pascal,
but I didn't configure a userdb with driver=ldap. There is only one
userdb with driver=static and I assumed, that every user gets the same
uid, gid and a valid home directory.
Are there some circumstances, that different passdb-drivers treated in
special relation to userdb-driv
On 05/31/2014 03:04 PM Christian Hoffmann wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a small problem with dovecot installed on ubuntu-13.10. I use
> dovcot as LDA with a LDAP-passdb and a pam-passdb. The userdb is static.
> A mail to LDAP-user 'foo' is delivered with the error-message
>
> dovecot: lda
agesieve_notify_capability = mailto
managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character
vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy
include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave
passdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf
driver = ldap
Can anyone tell me if this is a permission issue? IF so, what are the
expected permissions for 2.1.15? (because the 1.1.20 version works fine).
Thank you.
P.S. I will consider working with someone to resolve this condition.
On 5/27/2014 2:33 PM, Albert Whale wrote:
I am using Dovecot in two
El 27/05/14 13:05, Selcuk Yazar escribió:
Hi,
in dovecot documentation i try to implement quota per users.
i added dovecot-ldap.conf file
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home, uidNumber=uid, gidNumber=gid,
mailbox=mail, quota=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$
and i see in logs
quota(quota_rule=*:bytes=%$)=*
I am using Dovecot in two Server environments. My Legacy (5 years+
old) servers are running dovecot 1.1.20, and are responding as
expected. These servers are using an NFS based storage for the /home
directory structure, and are working beautifully. However, I need to
replace these inefficie
Hi,
in dovecot documentation i try to implement quota per users.
i added dovecot-ldap.conf file
user_attrs = homeDirectory=home, uidNumber=uid, gidNumber=gid,
mailbox=mail, quota=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$
and i see in logs
quota(quota_rule=*:bytes=%$)=*:bytes=241800
Debug: Added userdb setting:
On 05/22/2014 01:56 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Is there a good reason you're not just running ntpd?
Ntpdate has had a number of bugs in it for a long time, they will never
OK so after searching the issue it seems like:
I have installed the ntp on all of the servers and due to a faliure in
one of
On 5/22/14 4:30 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
> ntpdate is really only any good being run once (at boot), for example if
> you have a clock that can't keep time while the system is off.
I'm not aware of any cases where one needs to run ntpdate at startup
before running ntpd, because one can run 'ntpd -g
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:48:23PM +0300, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Well manually using a crontab with ntpdate to a pool of servers should be
> good enough right?
Not really. NTPdate steps the clock forward or backwards
instantaneously. Depending on how bad your system clock is, that could
be a ju
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tommy Berglund wrote:
How can I disable passdb { driver = pam }
in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-system.conf.ext
from file /etc/dovecot/local.conf.
I have postfix and dovecot set up to only use virtual users.
I'd rather do all the configuration in local.conf if possible.
# 2.2
On 5/22/14 3:48 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Well manually using a crontab with ntpdate to a pool of servers should
> be good enough right?
Is there a good reason you're not just running ntpd?
Ntpdate has had a number of bugs in it for a long time, they will never
be fixed, and ntpdate really is
Well manually using a crontab with ntpdate to a pool of servers should
be good enough right?
Eliezer
On 05/22/2014 07:09 AM, Murray Trainer wrote:
Hi Eliezer,
We had the same errors a few weeks ago. Turned out the time on our NFS
server was out by over 30 secs as NTP wasn't setup correctly .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tommy Berglund wrote:
How can I disable passdb { driver = pam }
in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-system.conf.ext
from file /etc/dovecot/local.conf.
I have postfix and dovecot set up to only use virtual users.
I'd rather do all the c
-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Eliezer
Croitoru
Sent: Wednesday, 21 May 2014 4:38 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: [Dovecot] Dovecot ontop of glusterfs issue.
Hey,
I am testing Glusterfs as a storage backend for dovecot as a LDA and imap
server.
I have seen similar lines in the logs to these:
May
Hello!
How can I disable passdb { driver = pam }
in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-system.conf.ext
from file /etc/dovecot/local.conf.
I have postfix and dovecot set up to only use virtual users.
I'd rather do all the configuration in local.conf if possible.
My doveconf-n
# 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot
Maciej Uhlig:
Please explain the following dovecot (2.2.13) behaviour: I run dovecot
in ldap auth debug mode and log file excerpt follows:
filter=(&(objectClass=MailAccount)(accountActive=TRUE)(mail=user@domain))
fields=mail,quota,mailbox
Hello,
no solution but a comment:
ldap.conf define
Hey,
I am testing Glusterfs as a storage backend for dovecot as a LDA and
imap server.
I have seen similar lines in the logs to these:
May 21 10:46:01 mailgw dovecot: imap(elie...@ngtech.co.il): Warning:
Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time
(1400658105 vs 1400658361
Please explain the following dovecot (2.2.13) behaviour: I run dovecot
in ldap auth debug mode and log file excerpt follows:
2014-05-21T08:22:01+02:00 dovecot/ip dovecot: auth: Debug:
ldap(user@domain,pcip,): bind search:
base=o=tree,dc=do,dc=ma,dc=in
filter=(&(objectClass=MailAccount)(accountActi
Jiri Bourek:
> Well they seem to know what they are talking about. The description
> of the threat in linked screenshot says "attacker needs to have
> ability to submit any plain text"
I wrote the attached patch to add SSL_OP_NO_COMPRESSION to dovecot.
Looks not perfect but definitly works.
Andre
Hello, I'm upgrading one of our servers to the last HG 2.2.13 versión
and I've found some problems with our configuration which has been
working fine with previous versions.
We have a LDAP userdb for the users and a master userdb for user
assistance, Until now the definition of usersdb in 10-a
Am 14.05.14 05:56, schrieb Eric Kom:
> Hi all,
> Please am looking for a repo for dovecot on CentOS where I can installed
> the latest never.
Search for city-fan dovecot rpm in google is what I was suggested.
Or: Get a payed subscription from http://www.dovecot.fi 99$/year AFAIK.
/Götz
-
That would be ATRPMS
On 14 May 2014 06:59, "Eric Kom" wrote:
> Hi all,
> Please am looking for a repo for dovecot on CentOS where I can installed
> the latest never.
> Thanks
>
Hi all,
Please am looking for a repo for dovecot on CentOS where I can installed
the latest never.
Thanks
On 13/05/14 3:26 PM, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
On h, máj 12, 2014 at 22:35:50 -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
On 12/05/14 2:59 PM, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
On h, máj 12, 2014 at 10:26:57 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 12.5.2014, at 10.07, Renaud Allard wrote:
checking whether fd passing works... no
configure
my configuration:
# 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 6.0.9
auth_cache_negative_ttl = 10 mins
auth_cache_size = 8 M
auth_cache_ttl = 20 mins
deliver_log_format = msgid=%m, from=%f, subject="%s": %$
dict {
acl = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.e
On h, máj 12, 2014 at 22:35:50 -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 12/05/14 2:59 PM, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> >On h, máj 12, 2014 at 10:26:57 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>On 12.5.2014, at 10.07, Renaud Allard wrote:
> >>
> >checking whether fd passing works... no
> >configure: error: fd passing
On 13.5.2014, at 10.21, Mihai Badici wrote:
> I try to create a shared directory in dovecot.
> When accessing ( from roundcube) i can't subscribe or list the namespace.
> It looks like I don't have rights.
>
> This is an extract from debug log:
> When I try to create a new folder in "Public" (i
Am 13.05.2014 09:22, schrieb Michael M Slusarz:
> Quoting Robert Schetterer :
>
>> Am 13.05.2014 08:40, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
>>> On Mon, 12 May 2014, sumsu...@gmx.de wrote:
>>>
>>> What's the question?
>>
>> perhaps have a look at
>>
>> https://sys4.de/de/blog/2013/03/25/outlook-2013-special-us
: Debug: maildir++:
root=/home/dovecot/private/Mihai.Badici/MAILDIR, index=, indexpvt=, control=,
inbox=/home/dovecot/private/Mihai.Badici/MAILDIR, alt=
May 12 23:10:07 imap(Mihai.Badici): Debug: acl: initializing backend with
data: vfile:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-acl
May 12 23:10:07 imap(Mihai
Quoting Robert Schetterer :
Am 13.05.2014 08:40, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
On Mon, 12 May 2014, sumsu...@gmx.de wrote:
What's the question?
perhaps have a look at
https://sys4.de/de/blog/2013/03/25/outlook-2013-special-use-mit-dovecot/
sorry german
K9 uses imap special-use
but clients some
Am 13.05.2014 08:40, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> On Mon, 12 May 2014, sumsu...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> What's the question?
perhaps have a look at
https://sys4.de/de/blog/2013/03/25/outlook-2013-special-use-mit-dovecot/
sorry german
K9 uses imap special-use
but clients sometimes use there own special
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 May 2014, sumsu...@gmx.de wrote:
What's the question?
# 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 3.10.25+ armv6l Debian 7.2
lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes
lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir
managesieve_no
On 12/05/14 2:59 PM, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
On h, máj 12, 2014 at 10:26:57 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 12.5.2014, at 10.07, Renaud Allard wrote:
checking whether fd passing works... no
configure: error: fd passing is required for Dovecot to work
What does config.log say about it?
configu
# 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 3.10.25+ armv6l Debian 7.2
lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes
lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir
managesieve_notify_capability = mailto
managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character
vacation subadd
On h, máj 12, 2014 at 10:26:57 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 12.5.2014, at 10.07, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
> >>> checking whether fd passing works... no
> >>> configure: error: fd passing is required for Dovecot to work
> >>
> >> What does config.log say about it?
> >>
> >
> > configure:21046
On 12.5.2014, at 10.07, Renaud Allard wrote:
>>> checking whether fd passing works... no
>>> configure: error: fd passing is required for Dovecot to work
>>
>> What does config.log say about it?
>>
>
> configure:21046: checking whether fd passing works
> configure:21120: gcc -o conftest -std=g
On 05/12/2014 09:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 12.5.2014, at 8.29, Renaud Allard wrote:
It seems that configure doesn't work anymore on OpenBSD 5.5
It was working on 2.2.12, and the test about fd passing seem the same.
checking whether fd passing works... no
configure: error: fd passing i
On 12.5.2014, at 8.29, Renaud Allard wrote:
> It seems that configure doesn't work anymore on OpenBSD 5.5
>
> It was working on 2.2.12, and the test about fd passing seem the same.
>
> checking whether fd passing works... no
> configure: error: fd passing is required for Dovecot to work
What d
Hello,
It seems that configure doesn't work anymore on OpenBSD 5.5
It was working on 2.2.12, and the test about fd passing seem the same.
checking whether fd passing works... no
configure: error: fd passing is required for Dovecot to work
Best Regards
On 05/11/2014 09:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wro
On 5/11/2014 5:14 AM, Alexandru Bostina wrote:
Nevermind, I think I found the problem.
It seems that Ubuntu's default settings for Dovecot are wrong, they
lack the "<" character before the certificate/key path.
So either of the following works:
ssl_cert_file = /dat/etc/ssl/certs/server.cr
at/etc/ssl/private/server.key
or
ssl_cert = mailto:a...@alnio.ro>
*Sent:* Sunday, May 11, 2014 12:04PM
*To:* Peter Chiochetti <mailto:p...@myzel.net>, Dovecot
<mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.2.9 - ssl_cert and ssl_key ignored
Yes, it does.
But I
cot@dovecot.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.2.9 - ssl_cert and ssl_key ignored
Am 2014-05-11 10:16, schrieb Alexandru Bostina:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that Dovecot ignores the new /ssl_cert and ssl_key /settings.
>
> Using them in the dovecot configuration results in the error
Am 2014-05-11 10:16, schrieb Alexandru Bostina:
Hello,
It seems that Dovecot ignores the new /ssl_cert and ssl_key /settings.
Using them in the dovecot configuration results in the error:
Fatal: Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM
routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line: Expecting: A
Hello,
It seems that Dovecot ignores the new /ssl_cert and ssl_key /settings.
Using them in the dovecot configuration results in the error:
Fatal: Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM
routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line: Expecting: ANY PRIVATE KEY]
Using the old /ssl_//cert//_fi
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 06:29:27PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> There's an upper limit to how many IMAP/POP3 connections can exist that
> haven't logged in (and separate limits for post-login). Normally when this
> limit is reached, the oldest connection gets disconnected. There is of course
>
1 - 100 of 7300 matches
Mail list logo
