On 17.10.2012, at 9.26, Fred Kilbourn wrote:
>> doveadm fts rescan makes sure that 1) all of the old messages are
>> indexed and 2) there are no extra (already deleted) messages indexed. So
>> it's basically repairing fts index. You probably shouldn't run it
>> automatically, or at least not very
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org]
> On Behalf Of Timo Sirainen
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:16 PM
> To: Fred Kilbourn
> Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Difference between Indexing and
On 17.10.2012, at 2.14, Fred Kilbourn wrote:
> I've had squat running on dovecot 2.0 and have been updating all users
> mailbox indexes nighty via cron with this command:
>
> doveadm -v search -A text xyzzyx
doveadm index is a bit more efficient.
> I've just updated to 2.1 and I'm migrating to
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org]
> On Behalf Of Jack Bates
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 9:44 PM
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Difference between Indexing and Rescan in FTS
>
&g
On 10/16/2012 6:14 PM, Fred Kilbourn wrote:
I've had squat running on dovecot 2.0 and have been updating all users
mailbox indexes nighty via cron with this command:
doveadm -v search -A text xyzzyx
I've just updated to 2.1 and I'm migrating to lucene indexes, but reading
the documentation
I've had squat running on dovecot 2.0 and have been updating all users
mailbox indexes nighty via cron with this command:
doveadm -v search -A text xyzzyx
I've just updated to 2.1 and I'm migrating to lucene indexes, but reading
the documentation I'm having a hard time understanding the semant
