Re: [Dovecot] Deferring, instead of rejecting, messages when at quota

2007-05-13 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 11:01 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote: > Likewise I'm not sure if I can simply change the source of deliver to > always return a temporary failure code because again there may be > other problems that occur which should be permanently failed. I couldn't find any other permane

Re: [Dovecot] Deferring, instead of rejecting, messages when at quota

2007-04-26 Thread Mike Brudenell
Greetings - On 26 Apr 2007, at 10:36, Magnus Holmgren wrote: In Exim, you can set the temp_errors option of the transport. I don't know what code is returned in this case, but I have temp_errors = 73:75:77:78:89. If Exim takes care of all the hard errors (like nonexisting user...) you can

Re: [Dovecot] Deferring, instead of rejecting, messages when at quota

2007-04-26 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Thursday 26 April 2007 11:17, Mike Brudenell wrote: > When I send a large test message to myself that cannot be delivered > because I don't have sufficient available quota remaining an error > message is immediately returned to the sender and the incoming > message discarded. The error message

[Dovecot] Deferring, instead of rejecting, messages when at quota

2007-04-26 Thread Mike Brudenell
Greetings - I'm having trouble working out where to alter this behaviour (so please forgive me if it turns out to be an Exim thing rather than Dovecot!)... My test service is using Exim as the MTA and Dovecot's "deliver" for the LDA. We are using Maildir mailboxes with filestore quotas.