On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Yes but the issue was only this one time because I sent in one single row
> several days of emails on an account which exists for years and years (so
> unfortunately my friend has now many spams in several days, as well as many
> real e
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Um.. did you or did you not say:
>
> "In my case, most of these messages were forwarded to the gmail servers,
> and as there were many spams unfortunately in these emails forwarded
> (and it's not my server's purpose to remove the spams
On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I won't forward spam to you, I already told you. This is just an email alias
> for a friend. It is just a email translation for a single external email
> which has been explicitely asked. My smtp server is not an open relay for
> any or
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> But if you relay any spam and get blacklisted for it, you will be the one
> that
> suffers. The blacklists don't care what your point of view is or if you
> generated the spam or just relayed it.
>
> Then everyone on your server will suffe
on 2-5-2009 6:47 AM Jehan Pagès spake the following:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Charles Marcus
> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what net neutrality has to do with this... unless you are
>> syaing you are operating an ISP service?
>>
>
> As for I, net neutrality is not about ISP only, but a
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Not sure what net neutrality has to do with this... unless you are
> syaing you are operating an ISP service?
>
As for I, net neutrality is not about ISP only, but also for service
providers (even if not professional like I, just for th
On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> That's unfortunate, but I cannot do what you say for these reasons. This is
> somehow a question of network neutrality (
> http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144 ).
Not sure what net neutrality has to do with this... unless you
Hi,
I don't agree. If antispam systems were really 100% sure to never have any
false positive, I would agree (having false negative is less an issue). But
we all know that such system does not exist yet (and probably never will
IMHO, even though efficiency may increase to close to 100%, as it is s
On 2/5/2009, Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> and as there were many spams unfortunately in these emails forwarded
> (and it's not my server's purpose to remove the spams when
> forwarding), all requeued and sent in the following minutes, I saw in
> my logs that gmail has tempora
Hi,
I finally found my solution so I give it here if ever it interestes anyone.
I needed to use "postsuper -r ALL" in order to requeue the whole message
list and they were then using the new postfix configuration.
Note though that if you have a lot lot of spooled messages, the "ALL" is
maybe not
Hi,
I am currently making a fresh install of email server. I am having some
issue with dovecot-antispam (cf. other emails), and noticed that I was
having issues on aliases, which apparently where not forwarded to the actual
SMTP server after passing through dspam. Still don't figure why but
tempor
11 matches
Mail list logo
