Jules M wrote:
Am 09.01.2009 um 17:03 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Jules M wrote:
Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using
such horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable",
I've set up a
Am 09.01.2009 um 17:03 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Jules M wrote:
Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for
using such horribly out of date versions just because they run
"stable", I've set up a page with .de
Jules M wrote:
Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using
such horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable",
I've set up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use
under le
Am 08.01.2009 um 23:43 schrieb Seth Mattinen:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using
such horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable",
I've set up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use
under lenny.
http://
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
http://www.rollernet.us/opensource/
Sorry I'm retarded;
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
If you really mean 'lenny'
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
If you really mean 'lenny'
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
> horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
> up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
>
If you really mean 'lenny', this won't help much.
Because I'm tired of seeing Debian users look like idiots for using such
horribly out of date versions just because they run "stable", I've set
up a page with .deb packages of my 1.1.x rebuilds for use under lenny.
http://www.rollernet.us/opensource/
Standard disclaimer applies: use at your ow
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:05:59PM +0200, Moritz Mertinkat may have written:
> Hi there,
>
> i'm looking for Debian sarge dovecot packages (yes, still running sarge).
> Anyone here that has a backported package?
I will likely be building one soon. It will be in the same location as I
put in the
Hi,
> I'd love some up-to-date packages for Dovecot on Etch. I need to get
> some practice in on my personal server before I migrate work... from
> 0.99.14 (Still going strong, Timo :)
You can get my 1.0.1 packages from
http://www.mertinkat.net/dovecot/
Built for Debian etch/i386.
Hope everythi
Moritz Mertinkat wrote:
Hi there,
anyone interested in Debian Dovecot 1.0.1 packages?
I have created a package for etch/stable...
Could do that for sarge/oldstable as well.
Greets,
Maurice.
I'd love some up-to-date packages for Dovecot on Etch. I need to get some
practice in on my personal
Hi there,
anyone interested in Debian Dovecot 1.0.1 packages?
I have created a package for etch/stable...
Could do that for sarge/oldstable as well.
Greets,
Maurice.
Hi there,
i'm looking for Debian sarge dovecot packages (yes, still running sarge).
Anyone here that has a backported package?
Greetings,
Moritz
Bernd Kuhls wrote:
Brian T Glenn wrote:
They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a
little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from
backports.org and is built for sarge.
deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main
I would like to have the sam
Brian T Glenn wrote:
They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a
little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from
backports.org and is built for sarge.
deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main
Hi,
I would like to have the same for Etch.
Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a
little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from
backports.org and is built for sarge.
deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main
Enjoy,
- --
http://www.d
17 matches
Mail list logo
