Am 11/28/2012 9:52 AM, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
Am 11/28/2012 2:26 AM, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 27.11.2012, at 15.06, Frerich Raabe wrote:
If I relax the ACL, I can mark the mail as seen myself. I guess
that means the question is - why didn't the sieve_before manage to
set the flag in all cases.
Am 11/28/2012 2:26 AM, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 27.11.2012, at 15.06, Frerich Raabe wrote:
If I relax the ACL, I can mark the mail as seen myself. I guess
that means the question is - why didn't the sieve_before manage to
set the flag in all cases.
Difficult to say, but I don't think it's wor
On 27.11.2012, at 15.06, Frerich Raabe wrote:
> Am 11/27/2012 1:53 PM, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
>> I first suspected a client issue so I did a little IMAP session by hand:
>
> [..]
>
>> Note how the first 'SEARCH UNSEEN' command shows that '27126' is unseen,
>> the subsequent 'STORE' command succe
Am 11/27/2012 1:53 PM, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
I first suspected a client issue so I did a little IMAP session by hand:
[..]
Note how the first 'SEARCH UNSEEN' command shows that '27126' is unseen,
the subsequent 'STORE' command succeeds - but then 'SEARCH UNSEEN' still
shows 27126 as unseen!
Hi,
I'm running Dovecot 1.2.17 on FreeBSD (exact output of 'dovecot -n' is
atttached to this mail). The machine is serving a public mailinglist
archive which is read-only; all mail arriving for the archive is marked
as \Seen using Sieve script.
This setup works well most of the time, but I n
