Am 17.01.2013 08:30, schrieb Frank Elsner:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:47:33 + Alexandr Sabitov wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have compared Dovecot performance to Courier and it appears that as a POP3
>> server Dovecot is slower in 2 times but as an IMAP server it is faster in
>> 1.5 times. The same
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:47:33 + Alexandr Sabitov wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have compared Dovecot performance to Courier and it appears that as a POP3
> server Dovecot is slower in 2 times but as an IMAP server it is faster in 1.5
> times. The same node (16CPUs), testing time is 30 min, please se
On 17.1.2013, at 6.23, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 17.1.2013, at 1.47, Alexandr Sabitov
> wrote:
>
>> I do not see anything else to tweak in Dovecot to increase POP3 performance.
>> Can we all have some tips to improve it please ?
Oh, and because of Dovecot index files it has to do a bit more
On 17.1.2013, at 1.47, Alexandr Sabitov
wrote:
> I do not see anything else to tweak in Dovecot to increase POP3 performance.
> Can we all have some tips to improve it please ?
>
> mail_fsync = always
Courier POP3 does no fsyncing. Although I'm not sure how much difference it
makes with NFS.
Hi All,
I have compared Dovecot performance to Courier and it appears that as a POP3
server Dovecot is slower in 2 times but as an IMAP server it is faster in 1.5
times. The same node (16CPUs), testing time is 30 min, please see results and
dovecot configs attached.
Benchmark software is MStone
