Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 30.4.2014, at 0.27, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
Not sure if this is an example of Cyrus' QP decoder being more
robust (or lenient) than Dovecot's. Or whether this is intentional
to return NIL for this kind of bad data.
It was kind of intentional. Dovecot's istrea
On 30.4.2014, at 0.27, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> Given this test message, with admittedly incorrect QP encoding:
..
> Dovecot 2.2 returns this:
>
> C: 5 UID FETCH 4464 (BINARY.PEEK[1])
> S: * 1 FETCH (UID 4464 BINARY[1] NIL)
> S: 5 OK Fetch completed.
>
> Contrast with, e.g., Cyrus 2.4:
>
> C
Given this test message, with admittedly incorrect QP encoding:
From: Test
Subject: Test
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain
To: Test
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:54:10 +
Message-Id: <1...@example.com>
https://example.com/?from=bsu&url=
