On 8/14/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
> However, the reactions to this action is quite wide spread. Some are
> glad, because they can download attachments on demand, others hate
> this extra step. Some user think the mail is altered and the
> copyright of the sender is
On 8/14/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
> I implemented a solution that works well for us, for a couple of months
> already. It has one serious limitation though, which will make it unsuitable
> for many environments: All mail receivers who are part of the process will be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-08-14 17:36, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>> able to see all attachments of all other mail receivers. So this only
>> works in a cooperative environment.
>
> One can extend that scheme a bit.
>
>> In short, a script (implemented as filter, get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Patrick Nagel wrote:
able to see all attachments of all other mail receivers. So this only works in
a cooperative environment.
One can extend that scheme a bit.
In short, a script (implemented as filter, getting called by pos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-08-13 20:46, Charles Marcus wrote:
[...]
> Again - for shops that must deal with large binary attachments, this
> would be a god-send.
>
> Our max allowed message size is 50MB, and we typically get anywhere from
> 2-10 messages a day cont
