On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:52 -0700, Rich, Whidbey Telecom wrote:
>
> > Dirsize was never meant to be used with maildir. Why do you want
> to
> > use it instead of maildir++ quota?
>
> We'd like to use maildir++ in the future, but haven't tested it yet
> with our MTA (which uses "dirsize"-like
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 20.3.2007, at 1.37, Rich, Whidbey Telecom wrote:
However, Dovecot only seems to do that when the "maildir" quota
plugin is specified (from "quota-maildir.c"):
Yep.
Shouldn't "save_size_in_filename" be included in "quota-
dirsize.c", sin
On 20.3.2007, at 1.37, Rich, Whidbey Telecom wrote:
However, Dovecot only seems to do that when the "maildir" quota
plugin is specified (from "quota-maildir.c"):
Yep.
Shouldn't "save_size_in_filename" be included in "quota-dirsize.c",
since "dirsize" is the one that actually needs "S="?
When APPENDing new message files to an IMAP Maildir, Dovecot 1.0 rc27
can be configured to add ",S=size" to the filename. That allows it
to be calculated with the "dirsize" quota plugin (and MTA's such as
Exim).
However, Dovecot only seems to do that when the "maildir" quota
plugin is sp
