On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 13:01 +0100, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
> > > str = MAIL_ACL_CREATE;
> > > array_append(rights, &str
> >
> > I gave it a try in the attached patch. Actually I considered that my
> > self but I'm (still) not sure if this is 100% legal according to the
> > standard.
>
> After a bi
Hi,
On 09.02.2009, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
[...]
> > How about instead of
> >
> > array_append(rights, &imap_acl_letter_map[8].name
> >
> > something like:
> >
> > str = MAIL_ACL_CREATE;
> > array_append(rights, &str
>
> I gave it a try in the attached patch. Actually I consi
Hi Timo,
thanks for your reply!
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 12:29 +0100, Sascha Wilde wrote:
>> I just recognized that the new imap-acl plugin in dovecot 1.2 does not
>> know the obsolete rights 'd' and 'c' when setting.
> ..
>> [0] I don't like the use of static indexes witc
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 12:29 +0100, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> I just recognized that the new imap-acl plugin in dovecot 1.2 does not
> know the obsolete rights 'd' and 'c' when setting.
..
> [0] I don't like the use of static indexes witch imap_acl_letter_map but
> currently I wasn't able to decid
Hello everyone,
while I understand (and am glad to see) that the codebase evolved almost
beyond recognition since I submitted it, from a superficial glance over the
present code, I get the impression that it might be better to employ an
additional check along the lines of what I had done in the pi
Hi Timo,
Hi *,
I just recognized that the new imap-acl plugin in dovecot 1.2 does not
know the obsolete rights 'd' and 'c' when setting. According to RFC
4314 section 2.1.1.:
If a client includes the "d" right in a rights list, then it MUST be
treated as if the client had included every
