On 04.08.2009 19:50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 4, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 03.08.2009 7:52, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:35 +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hi Timo,
Does this intended %u isn't expanding REALM name, so I've only see user
names.
I don't know
On Aug 4, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 03.08.2009 7:52, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:35 +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hi Timo,
Does this intended %u isn't expanding REALM name, so I've only see
user
names.
I don't know. What Dovecot version? What does it log
On 03.08.2009 7:52, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:35 +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Hi Timo,
Does this intended %u isn't expanding REALM name, so I've only see user
names.
I don't know. What Dovecot version? What does it log with
auth_debug=yes?
1.0.15
15:34:31 Info: auth(de
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:35 +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Does this intended %u isn't expanding REALM name, so I've only see user
> names.
I don't know. What Dovecot version? What does it log with
auth_debug=yes?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Timo,
Does this intended %u isn't expanding REALM name, so I've only see user
names.