On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 14:03 -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 14:00, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
>
> > Am 14.05.2010 um 19:51 schrieb Phil Howard:
> >
> > > It is the version packaged in Ubuntu 9.10 …
> >
> > This one is ancient. Also it has configuration syntax changes compared to
>
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 14:06, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 14.05.2010 um 20:03 schrieb Phil Howard:
>
> > I've been thinking that as soon as I get this working, I will plan a
> transition over to a newer server with Slackware instead of Ubuntu.
> Slackware is easier about letting you run packages
Am 14.05.2010 um 20:03 schrieb Phil Howard:
> I've been thinking that as soon as I get this working, I will plan a
> transition over to a newer server with Slackware instead of Ubuntu.
> Slackware is easier about letting you run packages you build from source.
Probably OT, but did you consider
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 14:00, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 14.05.2010 um 19:51 schrieb Phil Howard:
>
> > It is the version packaged in Ubuntu 9.10 …
>
> This one is ancient. Also it has configuration syntax changes compared to
> the latest production release. Anyway the debug parameters should wo
Am 14.05.2010 um 19:51 schrieb Phil Howard:
> It is the version packaged in Ubuntu 9.10 …
This one is ancient. Also it has configuration syntax changes compared to the
latest production release. Anyway the debug parameters should work, given they
are in the right conf file...
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 13:30, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 14.05.2010 um 19:25 schrieb Phil Howard:
>
> > Nothing new is showing up when I test sending some mail through (which
> does get delivered to that path constructed with an empty string for %).
> >
>
> Which version are you now testing on?
Am 14.05.2010 um 19:25 schrieb Phil Howard:
> Nothing new is showing up when I test sending some mail through (which does
> get delivered to that path constructed with an empty string for %).
>
Which version are you now testing on? Recent posts were set around the beta. Is
this for the 2.x bet
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:47, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> Am 14.05.2010 um 17:05 schrieb Phil Howard:
>
> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:20, Steffen Kaiser <
> skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Could you verify that the domain gets stripped by setting mail_debug,
> >> auth_verbose and
Am 14.05.2010 um 17:05 schrieb Phil Howard:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:20, Steffen Kaiser > wrote:
>
>> Could you verify that the domain gets stripped by setting mail_debug,
>> auth_verbose and auth_debug?
>>
>
> Where would I see the results of this?
In whatever logging facility you set up.
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:20, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> Could you verify that the domain gets stripped by setting mail_debug,
> auth_verbose and auth_debug?
>
Where would I see the results of this?
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:20, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>
> actually it looks like, nobody uses passwd-file like you do :)
>
This aspect can be changed, if needed. If needed, one big file with
u...@domain in the first colon-separated field would be doable, too.
> The doc at http://wiki.dovecot.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
actually it looks like, nobody uses passwd-file like you do :)
The doc at http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/PasswdFile would lead to
your assumption of operation, that is:
+ you auth using u...@domain
+
Hi,
You are stripping the domain part of the username with the username_format
specifiers:
passdb passwd-file {
args = scheme=crypt username_format=%Ln /etc/mailauth/%Ld.passwd
}
userdb passwd-file {
args = username_format=%Ln /etc/mailauth/%Ld.passwd
}
Try replacing %Ln with %Lu in
So what I am wondering, right now, is where the value for %d ... as used in
mail_location ... comes from when running in dovecot/deliver. Apparently it
is not getting anything through that means. Not know where it gets it from,
I don't know where to look to see what is misconfigured.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:00, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 10 May 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
>
> u...@domain address. The problem is that %d and %Ld are coming up as
>> empty,
>> and %12MLd is giving me the first 12 hex characters of an md5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
u...@domain address. The problem is that %d and %Ld are coming up as empty,
and %12MLd is giving me the first 12 hex characters of an md5 of an empty
content. It's losing the domain name somewhere. It's in
I have this in dovecot-postfix.conf:
mail_location =
maildir:/home/mail/dnamesum=%12MLd/dname=%Ld/unamesum=%12MLn/uname=%Ln/mail
Yes, it is excessive, but that's just for testing. The pattern I really
want is less clear for debugging. In postfix/main.cf I have:
mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovec
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 23:17 +0500, rihad wrote:
auth default:
username_format: %Ln
Why did you set this? You're the second person already having this
problem recently. Is there some HOWTO or something recommending to do
this?
Use %Lu instead.
It ain't me, it's stock
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 23:17 +0500, rihad wrote:
> auth default:
>username_format: %Ln
Why did you set this? You're the second person already having this
problem recently. Is there some HOWTO or something recommending to do
this?
Use %Lu instead.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 13:44 +0500, rihad wrote:
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..
Further investigation revealed that %u is just rihad and not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any hints?
You're dropping the domain somewhere. Maybe in auth_username_format? If
you can't fix it, send your doveco
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 13:44 +0500, rihad wrote:
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..
> Further investigation revealed that %u is just rihad and not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Any hints?
You're dropping the domain somewhere. Maybe in auth_username_format? If
you can't fix it, send your dovecot -n output.
sig
Hi, I'm a Dovecot newb playing with version 1.1.3 port under FreeBSD.
After setting up dovecot-sql.conf for MySQL I can't check mail via POP3:
...
password_query = \
SELECT CONCAT(username, '@', d.name) AS user, password \
FROM users u JOIN domains d ON u.domain_id=d.id \
22 matches
Mail list logo
