Replication between three or more servers

Hi list members, documentation says "Replication works only between server pairs. If you have a large cluster, you need multiple independently functioning Dovecot backend pairs". Do I understant correctly, that in order to have replication between 3 servers, one would need to run 2 instances o

Re: Remove attachments

) -- e. g. many antivirus/antispam filters have the ability to filter out attachments... But if that's primarily for a single user or there's no way to plug it in prior Dovecot, it could fit perfectly. Tomas On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 10:07:20AM +0200, Oliver Glas wrote: >Hello, &g

OAuth2: local validation with RFC9068 tokens

till JWT but has the required structure per RFC, which should not anyhow be in collision with a simple "JWT" typ. Saying that, I would not wonder if the statement is not correct :) Many thanks, Tomas

Dict Redis error: Unsupported operation (dict does not support this feature)

Hi all, when we try to delete any folder from Trash folder, for exmaple Trash.Test, Thunderbird and RoundCube IMAP clients show this error: DELETE: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2022-08-22 23:03:00] (0.001 + 0.000 secs). And deleted folder is still in Tra

Re: JWT local validation

to be scripted, but don't want to spend much time reinventing the wheel since I have no other mechanism to prevent outage in case of planned/unplanned/emergency signing key change... Thanks! Tomas On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:43:09AM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > On 24/06/2021 09:19 T

JWT local validation

. Is there any parameter to assert the token type or any other workaround to make local validation work as it currently fails with: oauth2 failed: Local validation failed: Cannot find 'typ' field. dovecot v2.3.15 Roundcube 1.5beta CentOS 8 Thanks, regards Tomas

auth debug log entry incorrect

while tuning /etc/krb5.conf on non-working remote client whilst local client had no issues (mutt). Anyway, to eventually save someone's time, this seems to be easy enough to be fixed. Thanks for this great software, Tomas dovecot[13337]: auth: Debug: ldap(sn...@example.com,10.0

Re: Race condition when setting flags (\Deleted) + expunge quickly, leaving mails not deleted

On 22 April, 2018 - Tomas Forsman wrote: > On 21 March, 2018 - Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > Thank you for your thorough report, we'll look into it. > > Has anyone managed to reproduce this (using my transcript for example)? Anyone? I would guess more people are affected.. /

Re: Race condition when setting flags (\Deleted) + expunge quickly, leaving mails not deleted

On 21 March, 2018 - Aki Tuomi wrote: > Thank you for your thorough report, we'll look into it. Has anyone managed to reproduce this (using my transcript for example)? With mutt, I get this problem.. If I set 'imap_pipeline_depth=0' in .muttrc, I can't seem to reprod

Race condition when setting flags (\Deleted) + expunge quickly, leaving mails not deleted

EXT 5] Predicted next UID a0010 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed (0.001 + 0.000 + 0.001 secs). * 1 FETCH (UID 1 FLAGS (\Recent)) * 2 FETCH (UID 2 FLAGS (\Recent)) * 3 FETCH (UID 3 FLAGS (\Recent)) * 4 FETCH (UID 4 FLAGS (\Recent)) a0015 OK Fetch completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs). a0020 UID STORE 1:3 +

Re: send specific NDR message for users in certain OU

That's something you probably want to do on the edge instead of message store, so a better place might be relocated_maps if you use Postfix. With that you can easily customize your ldap search base for accounts-to-be-deleted OU... T. On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 06:53:20PM +0100, lists wrote: > Hi,

Re: Dovecot can't connect to openldap over starttls

so there seems to be nothing wrong with both software at all, just some little thing in the configuration... Tomas On 03/20/2017 02:04 PM, i...@gwarband.de wrote: > I've tested your soulution, but it also says the same error. > I've tested all combinations of: >- t

Re: Dovecot can't connect to openldap over starttls

Auth process broken (disconnected before auth was ready, waited 30 secs) Tomas On 03/18/2017 02:22 PM, i...@gwarband.de wrote: > The serverlog of openldap with loglevel "any": > https://gwarband.de/openldap/openldap-connect.log > Note: openldap waits 1 Minute before he say

Re: Dovecot can't connect to openldap over starttls

Increase log level on server side as well to see what the server says... You may remove anything in TLSCipherSuite for the purpose of testing too. Hopefully anyone knowing OpenLDAP internals could help you analyse it more deeply. Tomas On 03/18/2017 01:31 PM, i...@gwarband.de wrote: > I

Re: Dovecot can't connect to openldap over starttls

to enable debug option for dovecot's client debug_level = -1 (which logs all available) in your dovecot-ldap.conf to see what the library reports and work further on that. You can compare with output from ldapsearch by adding -d-1 switch to it. Hard to tell more at the moment. Tomas O

Re: Dovecot can't connect to openldap over starttls

Dovecot's tls_ca_cert_file Is ldapsearch working ok (-ZZ) and only Dovecot has troubles or ... ? Hope that helps, good luck ;) Tomas On 03/17/2017 04:27 PM, i...@gwarband.de wrote: > Hello guys, > > actually I'm trying to configure dovecot to access openldap for > passwordch

Re: [Dovecot] dsync assert failure in 2.2.2

> with 2.2.2 and today's hg, dsync crashes with > dsync(root): Panic: file > ../../../../../src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-lock.c: line 797 (mbox_lock): > assertion failed: (lock_type == F_RDLCK || mbox->mbox_lock_type != F_RDLCK) > when I run > USER=root 2.2-hg/bin/dsync -c etc/dovecot.conf -f

[Dovecot] dsync assert failure in 2.2.2

Hi, with 2.2.2 and today's hg, dsync crashes with dsync(root): Panic: file ../../../../../src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-lock.c: line 797 (mbox_lock): assertion failed: (lock_type == F_RDLCK || mbox->mbox_lock_type != F_RDLCK) when I run USER=root 2.2-hg/bin/dsync -c etc/dovecot.conf -f -o mail

Re: [Dovecot] ntp revisited (so what to do ?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:28:38AM +0200, Per Jessen wrote: [...] > The usual setup is to do exactly that though - ntpdate (now sntp) at > startup to make sure the initial setting is reasonable, then ntpd to > keep it in sync. To be fair, that (esp

Re: [Dovecot] Pointers for developing a proper encryption plugin?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:05:29PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/06/2011 06:54 AM, Christian Felsing wrote: > > Am 04.01.2011 07:38, schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > >> The idea upthread (Jan-Frode) to keep a public key server-side and > >> encrypt

Re: [Dovecot] Pointers for developing a proper encryption plugin?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:54:57PM +0100, Christian Felsing wrote: > Am 04.01.2011 07:38, schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > > The idea upthread (Jan-Frode) to keep a public key server-side and > > encrypt messages on arrival seems to me the way to go. > > I

Re: [Dovecot] sdbox to mdbox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:01:25AM -0500, Joan Moreau wrote: > > > Not sure how do I get the "core" (core dumped are disabled in my > kernel) I think this is the "ulimit -c unlimited" part in Timo's mail. But we can't know for sure if we don't know

Re: [Dovecot] Pointers for developing a proper encryption plugin?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 01:53:37AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 3.1.2011, at 20.05, dove...@moorooboorai.com wrote: > > > One thing that's always itching when I think about mail-servers, is the > > storage of e-mail messages in (rather) plain-tex

Re: [Dovecot] DSYNC needs a lot more documentation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:00:19PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2010-08-21 12:51 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: > > When you write software you never have to learn it so you don't have > > the perspective of someone who never heard of it before and wonde

Re: [Dovecot] Thunderbird problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:04:39AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de put forth on 6/26/2010 11:52 PM: > > > The references are spot-on. The IDLE command is just designed to notify > > changes to the *selected* mailbox [...] > None of thi

Re: [Dovecot] Thunderbird problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 09:11:19PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/26/2010 2:08 AM: [...] > I'm no IMAP expert, but what you state here doesn't make any sense at all. [...] > postfix smtpd fire the email showed in my inbo

Re: [Dovecot] Cant get the config file just right

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 05:29:07PM -0700, eng15ine wrote: > > Hello, I have been trying to get POP3 on my ubuntu server for the past week > now (In Las Vegas on a family vacation carrying my netbook from hotel to > hotel.) My config file is below I am

Re: [Dovecot] Design: Asynchronous I/O for single/multi-dbox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:19:01PM -0400, Frank Cusack wrote: [...] > And when you don't want to block on I/O. Threads are almost always > easier than AIO, and especially easy (ie, no scary complexity issues > eg deadlock) if you aren't sharing data

Re: [Dovecot] Limit login attempts per connection?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:43:21PM -0500, Tony Nelson wrote: > On 10-03-04 00:51:40, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [...fail2ban...] > I already have something that works with any program secure enough not > to allow unlimited login attempts. Using fail2b

Re: [Dovecot] Limit login attempts per connection?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:39:28PM -0500, Tony Nelson wrote: > Dovecot allows a large number of login attempts per connection. I'd > like to reduce that number to, say, 1, and let my firewall keep the > ducks at bay, If the firewall is the one to d

Re: [Dovecot] salted passwords

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:09:34PM -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote: > > The idea of salted hash algorithms is to generate a different hash even > if the same text is entered. That can be easily seen with dovecotpw: I don't know about dovecot's al

Re: [Dovecot] CRAM-MD5 in Python

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:12:48PM +0100, Pascal Volk wrote: > On 12/16/2009 05:11 PM Andre wrote: > > Hi to all! > > … > > I’m implementing password crypto, but I have some problem in generating > > CRAM-MD5 password, dovecot style. > > … is there an

Re: [Dovecot] backup using rsync

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:15:02PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de schrieb: > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 03:41:40PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> i ll do backups with rsync on maildirs with courier > >> ( wh

Re: [Dovecot] backup using rsync

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 03:41:40PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: [...] > i ll do backups with rsync on maildirs with courier > ( which has also : in filenames ) Stupid question: with CIFS as target filesystem? Because there are some chars which a

Re: [Dovecot] E-Mail Encryption

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 03:48:25PM +0100, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > From: to...@tuxteam.de > > We do agree that local encryption of messages is a Good Thing [...] > > Did I forget anything? > > I think that's a pretty good summary of the situation. Wh

Re: [Dovecot] E-Mail Encryption

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 08:04:24AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > I've thought that it would be nice if my mail was always converted to > OpenPGP encrypted form. > > My setup is, I use fetchmail to pull in my mail to dovecot. Then I read it > using km

Re: [Dovecot] E-Mail Encryption

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:36:30AM -0500, Justin Krejci wrote: > Some companies and governments in the United States at least have very > strict policy requirements regarding various aspects of security and > encryption. Understandable. >

Re: [Dovecot] E-Mail Encryption

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:51:32AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote: [...] > Encrypting with a public key is completely reasonable, but for proper > security, the decryption should only take place on the client's trusted > workstation with their private ke

Re: [Dovecot] Directory Layout Performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:01:01AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 7/2/2009, to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote: [...] > > Hm. I think Reiser is [...] > Lets please stop with the FUD. Oops. Sorry. I didn't want to step on anyone's toes. > Y

Re: [Dovecot] Directory Layout Performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:06:24PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote: > >> Mario Antonio Garcia wrote: > >>> From a performance perspective: > > > > [...] > > > >>

Re: [Dovecot] Directory Layout Performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote: > Mario Antonio Garcia wrote: > > From a performance perspective: [...] > I use a filesystem that handles this better than ext3 such as XFS or Reiser. Ext3 should be fine for huge direct

Re: [Dovecot] Users with large (4GB) inboxes crippling dovecot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:25:58PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > On 30. mai. 2009, at 00.03, Scott Silva wrote: [...] > AFAIK an "updatedb" (as in locate/slocate) [...] This won't help with the original poster's problem (which is in helping the

Re: [Dovecot] Migration questions...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:28:42AM +, Richard Hobbs wrote: [...] > > Only dovecot 'deliver' will update the index on delivery. > > Do does this mean that it's slightly slower to actually deliver the mail > with dovecot (because it's writing two

Re: [Dovecot] Migration questions...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:09:06AM +, Richard Hobbs wrote: > Hello, [...] > That'd good to know. Do you happen to know where I can get a copy of > this "external script" you speak of? Will it simply be included in the > debian package (probably)?

Re: [Dovecot] Quota/Dict Postgres Trigger

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:38:27AM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Apr 29, 2009, at 3:25 AM, Warren Volz wrote: > >> I posted the trigger for v1.1 versions of Dovecot on the Wiki >> (http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict) and while I understand the comm

Re: [Dovecot] FTS Plugin design

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:27:47PM +0100, rui.carne...@portugalmail.net wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:47 AM, wrote: > > Note that some formats might require to seek to some point in the file [1] [...] > I hadn't thought on that before but

Re: [Dovecot] FTS Plugin design

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:51:45PM +0100, Rui Carneiro wrote: [...] > Cons: > - Some programs to parse special formats (p.e. catppt and pdftotext) do not > accept input from stdin (we need to create temporary files). [from the peanut gallery here]

Re: [Dovecot] Issue with converting users from cyrus user.domain.com

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:47:22AM -0600, Preston Lord wrote: [...] > dovecot --version > 1.0.15 Hmmm. The newest avaliable packaged version to etch seems to be 1.0.15, that's from backports [1], it seems. The standard etch package is 1.0.rc15 [2]

Re: [Dovecot] which architecture to use?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:34:35PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 3/12/2009, to...@tuxteam.de (to...@tuxteam.de) wrote: > >> Again... creating/managing users is NOT an MTA function, so this > >> question has nothing to do with sendmail vs postfix..

Re: [Dovecot] which architecture to use?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 08:44:14AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: [...] > Again... creating/managing users is NOT an MTA function, so this > question has nothing to do with sendmail vs postfix... Nitpick: if you don't want to set up your MTA to accept

Re: [Dovecot] problems to users want connect after not activity in dovecot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:27:54PM -0200, maximatt wrote: > hi, [...] > dovecot: Feb 06 20:45:55 Info: IMAP(user1): trash plugin: Added 'Sent > Messages' with priority 3 > dovecot: Feb 06 20:45:55 Info: IMAP(user1): maildir: > data=/var/vmail/mydomai

Re: [Dovecot] Quick question...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:28:50PM -0600, dove...@segel.com wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the scenario. > > I want to set up a mailbox so that when mail sent to the address is piped to > a processing application, instead of going to a mailbox. Conceptuall

Re: [Dovecot] Time moved backwards ....

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 06:08:04PM +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:17:18PM +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote: >> >>> OK.. >>> So I synced the cloc

Re: [Dovecot] Time moved backwards ....

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:17:18PM +0200, Harry Lachanas wrote: > OK.. > So I synced the clock > and got > > dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 1 seconds. I'll sleep now until we're > back in present. http://wiki.dovecot.org/TimeMovedBack

Re: [Dovecot] OT: Looking for a robust IMAP client

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:45:13PM -0500, Stewart Dean wrote: [...] > Is there a simple robust IMAP client to replace Pine (which I *think* is no > longer supported)? GUI or TTY session? I switched from Pine to Mutt (quite a while ago) and to me,

Re: [Dovecot] Performance issue about maildir path.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:11:43AM +, Jose Celestino wrote: > Words by Zhang Huangbin [Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:00:45AM +0800]: > > Hi, all. > > > > Normally, i use 'domain.ltd/username/Maildir' as users' maildir path, if > > i change them to hash s

[Dovecot] Mbox problem in 1.1.3 solved in 1.1.4

s fully reproducable in 1.1.3, but in the newly released 1.1.4 this does not happen anymore. All is well, birds are singing etc. /Tomas -- Tomas Ögren, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.cs.umu.se/~stric/ `- Student and SysAdmin at Computing Science, University of Umeå

Re: [Dovecot] Help required to login to Deovecot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:03:39PM +0530, Rajiv Gore wrote: > I am truing to Login to Dovecot. > The error is as below > > "Logins for users with primary group ID 0 not permitted (see first_valid_gid > in config file)." You are in the root group. Th

Re: [Dovecot] Improvements to "Authentication failed" error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 11:04:18PM -0700, Don Steiny wrote: Please, don't top-quote. Pretty please. You see what happens: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have a problem and I have not been able to figure out how to get it to > log any useful inform

Re: [Dovecot] Improvements to "Authentication failed" error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:58:35AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 00:51 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > 2) People who don't even think about looking at logs. > > Oh, one more alternative to this I thought of: I think still 2b is

Re: [Dovecot] client certs with godaddy ssl cert

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 07:18:46PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Harondel J. Sibble wrote: > >>> Dovecot does have to trust the signing cert for the clients (i.e. it >>> can't >>> just be looking at some default bundle of c

Re: [Dovecot] Any suggestions for backing up an imap server and whould maildir or dbox be better than mbox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 08:52:13PM -0400, Eric T wrote: > > >> BTW: Dose changing the mailbox format from mbox to Maildir or dbox dose > >> have any advantages? > > > > I don't think it makes any difference in this case. > > > > It would make a di

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 1.0.10 inet_addr(0.0.0.0)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:30:58AM +0200, Zbigniew Polito wrote: > Hi, > I've got a problem. > my Dovecot is not running ;) > It immidiately exits when run with no output info > I've figuret out that is something wrong with network but i can't find >

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:37:53PM -0300, Sebastien Tandel wrote: [...] >> [fork is fast] > OK, it measures the fork instruction. But fork is using a copy-on-write > mechanism ... It means that *none* of the parent's memory pages are copied. > Eac

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot performance

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:38:50PM -0300, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote: > Hello All, [...] > It is well known that preforking is a good pratice if you want to > achieve a higher performance. > When I was asked about it I readily answered: "of course it do

Re: [Dovecot] 1.1 and the zlib plugin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OT, maybe, but this... > namespace private { > separator = . > hidden = no > inbox = yes > prefox = ^^^ ...is such a nice typo I I couldn't resist :-) But I doubt it has to do with your original proble

Re: [Dovecot] Error using antispam plugin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:21:27AM +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > What flags should i then use? I have tried with "-g3 -O0" and only > with "-O0" but i do not get any additional info. Hmm. It should. I'm tight on time, but you can have a look in

Re: [Dovecot] mbox: extra linefeed after Content-Length header in 1.1.rc8

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:03:34PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote: [...] > Python has an re.MULTILINE option you can pass to the regular expression so > that it can cross lines. Perhaps Perl or your favorite regular expression > toolkit has something

Re: [Dovecot] Error using antispam plugin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:53:10PM +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > Applying the change Timo has said i get this: [...] > Very similar to previous post (if not identical). Timo, how can i > compile with the -O2 option when building from debian so

Re: [Dovecot] Feature Request - starting dovecot, config file behavior

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:43:37AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > Hey Timo, > > I was wondering how much trouble it would be to again emulate the way > postfix does something [...] [last config item should win] FWIW I was just bitten by something l

Re: [Dovecot] sieve header :matches for multiline header

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 05:38:35PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:49:16PM +0300, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > > RFC3028 say: > > Not an answer, but note that RFC3028 has been superseded by RFC5228. ...which both refer to RFC2

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot dead

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:22:36PM +0800, Allen Sim wrote: [please keep list cc'ed: this might help others] > Hi Tomas > Happy Easter! Same to you :-) > Great to hear from you and indeed your reply really help me a lot! My > d

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot dead

bin/dovecot | root 4466 0.0 1.5 8708 2084 ?SMar14 0:00 dovecot-auth | dovecot 15609 0.0 1.1 3380 1520 ?SMar20 0:00 imap-login | dovecot 15621 0.0 1.1 3376 1520 ?SMar20 0:00 imap-login | dovecot 15654 0.0 1.1 3376 1520 ?

Re: [Dovecot] question about dovecot imap outlook clients

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 04:53:44PM -0700, Joseph Norris wrote: > Hello, > > Well... thanks to the input of all of you I have my dovecot->ldap > connection working for almost all of my clients, however... > > on outlook, a message for certificates be

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA (deliver) stopped working

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:14:15PM -0600, falz wrote: > [...] STRACE found the problem for me! [...] Good to hear! > write(7, "deliver(username): Jan 25 12:58:"..., 100) = -1 EFBIG (File too > large) Hmmm... > So, the issue was that SOMETHING is e

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA (deliver) stopped working

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:03:30AM -0600, falz wrote: > On Jan 25, 2008 9:22 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Postfix people suggested placing a wrapper script for mailbox_command, > > > which I did, and have it log to a text file, so I do know th

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA (deliver) stopped working

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:42:09AM -0600, falz wrote: > Hello, > > One day a week or so ago, a server that's Postifx w/ Local users, > dovecot w/ LDA decided to stop working [...] > Postfix people suggested placing a wrapper script for mailbox_comman

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot at Solaris 10 with LDAP : Buggy LDAP library returned wrong fd: 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > > I installed Dovecot-1.0.10 at my Solaris 10 with LDAP support. It runs > > > fine without LDAP. But when I configured LDAP and start it, it shows the > > > following error, > > > > > > dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] auth(default): LDAP: Buggy

Re: [Dovecot] backup dovecot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 04:14:10PM -0500, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: [...] > That'd shorten the command to: > > rsync -av /source_maildirs/ hostname:/destination/maildirs I'd add a z option for good measure (compress) -- at least if you consider yo

Re: [Dovecot] login_process_size too small on x86_64 Fedora/RHEL

Hello, On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 08:12:43PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 17:56 +0100, Tomas Janousek wrote: > > Shall we just increase login_process_size or make it arch-dependent or > > something? > > Let's just increase the default to 64MB. Ok

[Dovecot] login_process_size too small on x86_64 Fedora/RHEL

ke it arch-dependent or something? Regards, -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-auth: Too many open files

scriptors, I'm still not sure what the true root > [...] > > Auth config: > auth_userdb = passwd > auth_passdb = pam > [...] Do you use LDAP or just local passwd? -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.

Re: [Dovecot] OT: Cron Output When Deleting Files

l /tmp/find-rm > rm /tmp/find-rm Or, having the right version of rm: find ./ -type f -ctime +14 | xargs rm -v | wc -l regards - -- tomas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHFMhnBcgs9XrR2kYRAlY5AJsHaVgFfM/3fZHX8afVSqZjD9GBMACeKD0a Zm2ZzYfl4S6olYb2a7oz49g= =9uRg -END PGP SIGNATURE-

[Dovecot] Maildir ignore

Hello there. I do like Dovecot so far, but ran into problem I cant seem to solve, maybe someone can point me into right direction please. I am running version 1.0.rc15 on CentOS 5 Linux i386 system, ext3 fs. The problem is I cant get the maildir: and :ignore to work together. Here is my SQL q

Re: [Dovecot] RHEL 5.1 beta, Dovecot 1.0.3: error while loading shared libraries?

dovecot: imap-login: imap-login: error while loading > shared libraries: libsepol.so.1: failed to map segment from shared object: > Cannot allocate memory I think this is it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253363#c2 Regards, -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.

Re: [Dovecot] too many files opened

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221572 [154314] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=154314 > passdb: > driver: pam > userdb: > driver: passwd Please, try to use userdb ldap in dovecot.conf. That way you don't use nss_ldap, which is buggy. -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot should raise the limit of file descriptors at startup...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:07:10AM +0200, Angel Marin wrote: > Timo Sirainen escribió: > > On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 15:08 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote: > >> Perhaps the Dovecot master process should raise it's own limit to the > >> allowed maximum when it

Re: [Dovecot] maildir question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:36:38AM +1000, Tim Bates wrote: > If I copy message files (from a command prompt) will dovecot get upset > or confused? Dovecot is supposed to cope just fine. See

Re: [Dovecot] Moving a mail between folders and post-processing ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 12:56:12PM +0100, Jerry Nicholls wrote: > Hi, > > Within Dovecot is there a way of spotting a change to a folder and > running a post-processing script [...] Ah, I posed a similar question (with similar intentions ;-) on this

Re: [Dovecot] using complete email address as username

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:47:14PM -0400, Jim Horner wrote: > On Sunday 12 August 2007 14:10:53 WJCarpenter wrote: > > I've been poking around the dovecot wiki, and this idea looks > > plausible. I'm just double-checking with the assembled experts to

Re: [Dovecot] Moving mboxes around

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:37:16PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:07 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > - Is it OK to move mailboxes around from under Dovecot? > > Yes. Cool. I'm impressed by Dovecot, really :-) > > - Is t

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-sieve vacation changes

yrus-bugs is (or at least seems to be) a black hole. Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> directly. Regards, -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.

Re: [Dovecot] [PATCH] Split sql drivers from lib-sql to plugins

Hi, On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:02:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > I committed a modified version of this to v1.1 tree. It's now enabled > with --with-sql=plugin. > > I also added --with-ldap=plugin and --with-gssapi=plugin. Great, thanks! -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.

[Dovecot] Moving mboxes around

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dovecot gurus, I have a couple of questions for which I haven't found answers in the docs (which may be well more a limitation of my capabilities than anything else). Here they go: - Is it OK to move mailboxes around from under Dovecot? Case in poi

Re: [Dovecot] v1.0.0 released

put it into FC6 within a few days. ;) Regards, -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.

Re: [Dovecot] [PATCH] Split sql drivers from lib-sql to plugins

Hi, a new version of the sql split patch attached, should be smaller, cleaner, better. -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc. --- dovecot-1.0.rc32/src/dict/main.c.split 2007-02-22 15:32:11.0 +0100 +++ dovecot-1.0.rc32/src/dict/main.c2007-04-13 13:56:55.0 +0200

Re: [Dovecot] [PATCH] Split sql drivers from lib-sql to plugins

those files to the sql subdir and apply the part of my patch that loads the modules. There's simply no code in dovecot-auth that would load the modules. Regards, -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.

[Dovecot] [PATCH] Split sql drivers from lib-sql to plugins

. Regards, -- Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.