in that case
another single header to let postfix filter for that (by header_checks
FILTER) and choose the right relay host based on the information set in
the new header - but currently I don't need that.
Thx everybody so far!
--
Cheers
spi
___
d
ver the mail directly to the receiving MX and does not respect my
relay hosts.
What I am currently trying to figure out is, is there a way to tell
postfix in case it is a vacation reply with no envelope to but a valid
from header use that from header as a rule for choosing the right relay
ho
s based on the From: address (which is set by the sieve vacation
plugin) rather than the "mail from" address.
--
Cheers
spi
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
mail for
a...@aaa.com, allowing sieve to run for a...@aaa.com, and users login as
a...@aaa.com on IMAP to check their mail?
That would work if users only had one alias, but they don't - they have
several aliases.
--
Cheers
spi
___
dovecot mailing
nal-to
header? Or any other approch to get that working with lmtp (and not
switching back to lda)?
--
Cheers
spi
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
s sender. If I omitted the
sender setting - how could I tell postfix to relay these ooo mails
through the correct relay (like based on the From header domain in the
vacation response)?
What would the right approach be to set the sender right or get postfix
to relay the vacation responses cor
Am 11.03.23 um 19:51 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
Am Samstag, dem 11.03.2023 um 19:30 +0100 schrieb spi:
11.03.2023 19:23:21 Benny Pedersen :
spi skrev den 2023-03-11 13:34:
if address :domain "From" "whatever.com"{
fileinto :flags ["\\todo"] "worki
11.03.2023 19:23:21 Benny Pedersen :
> spi skrev den 2023-03-11 13:34:
>
>> if address :domain "From" "whatever.com"{
>> fileinto :flags ["\\todo"] "working/whatever";
>> }
>
> require ["fileinto","imap4flag
nly can be used in global scripts. Is there any
way to get incoming mails labled and sorted by user sieve scripts?
So something like this for a particular user doesn't work:
if address :domain "From" "whatever.com"{
fileinto :flags ["\\todo"] "working/whatever";
}
--
Cheers
spi
ilbox
folders. It all worked so far - still I wonder if there might be any
issues with snapshotting a file system rather than using 'doveadm
backup'. With databases I flush/dump/whatever them so it it safe to
snapshot their volume.
--
Cheers
spi
The sieve Thunderbird add-on is broken very often - there is a standalone
version as well which works much better. If the newest version does not work,
check some older releases.
29.10.2022 00:54:47 Shawn Heisey :
> On 10/17/22 04:46, Marc wrote:
>> I only see configurations that are active fo
authenticate users by client certificates and route
them to the appriopriate backend (well, I only have one ;-).
--
Cheers
spi
Am 12.10.22 um 15:21 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
On 2022-10-11, Bernardo Reino wrote:
Please please stop top-posting. Makes a mess of everything!
I think everything that can be said in this thread, already has been said...
But not by everybody...
--
Cheers
spi
ight break trust in future.
--
Cheers
spi
and route access to backend based on client
certificate).
Cheers,
spi
;stat
file"? Play with the permissions and user/group assignments. Still
getting an error?
--
Cheers
spi
k file sharing like nfs?
ACLs you can check by 'getfacl foo'.
--
Cheers
spi
from one
mailbox to another reset their keywords.
--
Cheers
spi
Am 11.08.22 um 12:42 schrieb Jochen Bern:
On 11.08.22 12:22, spi wrote:
What would happen if the list is full and the user needs to change a
keyword?
The maximum limit is pretty large, so it's unlikely you end up with
that many keywords.
Hm, that scares me as after some time users ge
time?
Is there any way you might think of to get the response overwritten? so
no matter what is in the index file the server responds with "a b c"?
--
Cheers
spi
The maximum limit is pretty large, so it's unlikely you end up with that many
keywords.
It's not safe to delete in
Am 11.08.22 um 10:55 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
Currently there are some mails in my inbox.
'doveadm -f flow -v fetch -u spi 'flags uid' mailbox Inbox' shows
flags=\Seen uid=3
flags=\Seen $Forwarded uid=4
flags=\Seen NonJunk 3_warten uid=5
flags=\Seen NonJunk uid=6
flags
over IMAP connection, not what the index files contain.
Aki
Currently there are some mails in my inbox.
'doveadm -f flow -v fetch -u spi 'flags uid' mailbox Inbox' shows
flags=\Seen uid=3
flags=\Seen $Forwarded uid=4
flags=\Seen NonJunk 3_warten uid=5
flags=\Seen NonJunk
keywords actually used in the mails and the ones in the index file. I
had to delete the index files to reset that list - and I don't like
deleting the index files on sdbox.
Is there a way to fix or circumvent that?
--
Cheers
spi
Am 08.08.22 um 11:57 schrieb spi:
I am using Dovecot 2.3.4.1 with sdbox and mostly Thunderbird on Linux
and FairEmail on Android as IMAP clients.
I use a defined set of IMAP keywords to allow different users to mark
and filter their mails based on keywords. That works pretty well but I
stumble
ails by IMAP anymore.
Am using mailfromd as milter: https://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/mailfromd/
--
Cheers
spi
leted?). It seems, Dovecot caches the keywords in the
index files.
Question:
1) Is there a way on Dovecot to define a list of keywords Dovecot
presents to the IMAP clients?
2) If not, is there a nicer way to clean the keyword lists from old
entries not assigned to any mail in that folder?
--
Cheers
spi
26 matches
Mail list logo
