From memory Outlook Express/Windows Mail requests capabilities before
login (and never after login)?
I don't know about them, but I remember someone told me Outlook was
fine. The point anyway is that clients don't have to request anything,
the capability is pushed to them. There are tw
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 03:40 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 15:04 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
>>
>>> I've got a problem with Dovecot 1.2rc7 and a Sieve script which should
>>> store eMails in a subfolder.
Hi,
I've got a problem with Dovecot 1.2rc7 and a Sieve script which should
store eMails in a subfolder. It always fails with
Jun 28 14:56:43 deliver(): Error: sieve:
msgid=<4a47687d.30...@some.domain>: failed to store into mailbox '':
Invalid mailbox name
Jun 28 14:56:43 deliver(): Error: sieve:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 22:02 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
>> Sorry for replying so late, the server running Dovecot succumbed to a
>> hardware problem. Now that the machine is online again, I applied your
>> patch. Running the expire tool now causes the following log me
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> Oh, yes, that's it! When I wrote the code I noticed that the line looked
> a bit short. I thought it might have been because it was missing '.' at
> the end that all other commands had, but it must have been the lack of
> OK that kept nagging my subconsciousness. :)
>
> Fix
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 20:29 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
>
>> The effect on Outlook/OE is that it keeps asking for the password...
>>
>
> Hmh. What about with the attached patch? I guess it then at least logs
> in, but does it use IDLE?
>
> So it saw the CAPABILITY response, but apparently not the tagged OK
> response, and then it timed out and tried again later? But two things:
>
> 1) The post-login CAPABILITY reply is wrong. Did you set imap_capability
> setting manually? Remove it.
>
> 2) Did Dovecot really not send OK reply or
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> Implemented it now to v2.0:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/5f64f935e64b
>
> You could test this by first verifying with older Dovecot or another
> IMAP server that Outlook/OE/etc. actually uses some IMAP extension, such
> as IDLE. Use e.g. Dovecot's rawlog or some
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 10:24 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
>
>>> Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/0b3225f7b3a6
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Timo,
>>
>> hmm, partly. It show up as expected now, bu
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> Implemented it now to v2.0:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/5f64f935e64b
>
> You could test this by first verifying with older Dovecot or another
> IMAP server that Outlook/OE/etc. actually uses some IMAP extension, such
> as IDLE. Use e.g. Dovecot's rawlog or some
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>
>
> 3. Mail processes talk to storage processes via some protocol. They
> can talk via UNIX socket or TCP/IP. If an existing connection can't
> handle the target UID, a new connection is made that either reuses an
> existing storage proces or creates a new one.
>
This sound
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>
>> For gathering the capabilities of plugins, etc. Would it be a viable
>> solution to demand the plugins to pass capabilities at the point where
>> the plugin registers/loads itself? That way it may not be that ugly?
>
> The problem is that Dovecot's IMAP code is split to
answered the wrong address...
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On May 27, 2009, at 2:35 AM, reg9009 wrote:
>
>> what if TB just needs the "IMAP4rev1" capability before logging in?
>
> That's a completely different issue. Meaning that v2.0 is buggy here
> currently and
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On May 27, 2009, at 2:22 AM, reg9009 wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, dovecot should give capabilities, regardless if before
>> or after login sequence. What would be the problem of it or why would
>> it be intented to be removed. It would actually jus
Am 27.05.2009 04:44, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
TB3 seems to be fine without extra capability stuff.
Does it still ask for the CAPABILITY command? One solution could
actually be that Dovecot just stops giving the full CAPABILITY before
logging in. I did some tests for this recently, and it
Am 26.05.2009 09:21, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 09:06 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
Well, I think it doesn't honour the separator "/". It still uses ".":
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/0b3225f7b3a6
Hi Timo,
hmm, partly. It sho
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 08:21 +0200, reg9009 wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've got some namespace problems with dovecot 2.0 again. If I start
>> dovecot 2.0 with same settings of namespace and maildir layout as
>> dovecot 1.2, I do
Hi,
I think there are some files missing (regarding auth mech-external):
compile error (did fresh autogen.sh):
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-auth
-I../../src/lib-sql -I../../src/lib-settings -I../../src/lib-ntlm
-I../../src/lib-otp -I../../src/lib-master
-DAUTH
Hi all,
I've got some namespace problems with dovecot 2.0 again. If I start
dovecot 2.0 with same settings of namespace and maildir layout as
dovecot 1.2, I don't see my folders above the Inbox. I see them as
"INBOX/xxx" in the same root level as my INBOX. If I try to subscribe to
the folders, I s
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:32 +, ja nein wrote:
>
>> and while trying to get some environmental stuff via dovecot -n, I got a
>> segfault (dovecot is not in system path):
>>
>> /opt/dovecot-2.0/sbin/dovecot -c /etc/dovecot-2.0/sql/dovecot.conf -n
>>
>
> Could you
20 matches
Mail list logo
